2020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012826.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial-thickness burns

Abstract: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:To assess the effects of hydrosurgical debridement and skin grafting versus conventional surgical debridement and skin grafting for the treatment of acute partial-thickness burns.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This system has certain advantages vs. traditional mechanical debridement, since it allows for greater accessibility in difficult areas. However, the fact it is a small device may extend the procedure in time, thus increasing the risk of hypothermia (13) .…”
Section: Surgical Debridementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has certain advantages vs. traditional mechanical debridement, since it allows for greater accessibility in difficult areas. However, the fact it is a small device may extend the procedure in time, thus increasing the risk of hypothermia (13) .…”
Section: Surgical Debridementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este sistema presenta ciertas ventajas frente al desbridamiento mecánico tradicional y permite una mayor accesibilidad en zonas difíciles. Por otra parte, precisamente su pequeño tamaño puede convertir el procedimiento en más lento de lo deseable, aumentando el riesgo de hipotermia (13) .…”
Section: Desbridamiento Quirúrgicounclassified
“…9,10 In addition to chronic wounds, people often suffer from various accidental causes, such as skin abrasions, sharp weapon stings, cuts, or burns (i.e., caused by fire or hydrothermal injuries). [11][12][13] Such wound sites are often contaminated with sand, debris, and/or bacteria. In most scenarios, iodine, alcohol, or saline can be used for simple flushing decontamination at the wound site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%