2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrothermal carbonization, torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of Miscanthus giganteus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
54
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Only torrefied cotton stalks obtained after four trials at 320°C started to have properties similar to coal. The similar results have been obtained by using different biomass in previous study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only torrefied cotton stalks obtained after four trials at 320°C started to have properties similar to coal. The similar results have been obtained by using different biomass in previous study …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cotton stalks were torrefied at 260°C to 320°C, with residence times of 10, 35, and 60 minutes and density of 125, 150, and 175 kg m −3 based on parameters in experimental sets indicated in Table . When carbon content, one of the most important parameters for torrefaction, was examined, the obtained results were compatible with the literature . Mean carbon content was found to be 57.56% in trials carried out at 260°C with different residence time and density, an increase of 28% was observed after the process compared with the raw material.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a consistent decrease with temperature or reaction time wasn't observed. Similar decreases for the HTC of grape pomace and mischantus samples were also observed in other studies [18,19]. In this study, ash contents of hydrochars slightly changed (Figure 1).…”
Section: Fuel Characteristics Of Charssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A study on six sweetcane varieties showed that the N content and carbon (C) content of the harvested sweetcane were in the range of 0.37%‐0.83% and 44.7%‐45.8%, respectively (Hu et al, ). As a result, the C/N ratio of sweetcane was from 62.6 to 121.6, and the highest value was comparable with Miscanthus × giganteus (Michel et al, ; Wilk & Magdziarz, ). In addition, the harvest time also affects the nutrient removal efficiency of sweetcane.…”
Section: Potential For Phytoremediationmentioning
confidence: 99%