2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3765(20000218)6:4<625::aid-chem625>3.3.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroxo Hydrido Complexes of Iron and Cobalt (Sn−Fe−Sn, Sn−Co−Sn): Probing Agostic Sn⋅⋅⋅H−M Interactions in Solution and in the Solid State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of 11 exhibits a four-membered ring of Fe, Sn, O, Sn atoms with the geometrical parameters Fe–Sn = 2.522(1) Å; Sn–O = 2.124(6) Å; Sn···Sn = 3.162 Å; Sn–Fe–Sn = 77.61(3)°; Fe–Sn–O = 93.1(1)°; and Sn–O–Sn = 96.2(2)°. These parameters are similar to those reported by Schneider et al for (η 6 -C 7 H 8 )­Fe­(μ-OH)­H­{Sn­[CH­(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 2 } 2 . The geometries at Fe are different for the two complexes, with a classic piano-stool geometry for 11 , in contrast with the trigonal planar arrangement of the Fe hydride complex due to the presence of the CO group in 11 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The structure of 11 exhibits a four-membered ring of Fe, Sn, O, Sn atoms with the geometrical parameters Fe–Sn = 2.522(1) Å; Sn–O = 2.124(6) Å; Sn···Sn = 3.162 Å; Sn–Fe–Sn = 77.61(3)°; Fe–Sn–O = 93.1(1)°; and Sn–O–Sn = 96.2(2)°. These parameters are similar to those reported by Schneider et al for (η 6 -C 7 H 8 )­Fe­(μ-OH)­H­{Sn­[CH­(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 2 } 2 . The geometries at Fe are different for the two complexes, with a classic piano-stool geometry for 11 , in contrast with the trigonal planar arrangement of the Fe hydride complex due to the presence of the CO group in 11 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These parameters are similar to those reported by Schneider et al for (η 6 -C 7 H 8 )­Fe­(μ-OH)­H­{Sn­[CH­(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 2 } 2 . The geometries at Fe are different for the two complexes, with a classic piano-stool geometry for 11 , in contrast with the trigonal planar arrangement of the Fe hydride complex due to the presence of the CO group in 11 . The Fe–Sn distance of 2.522(1) Å is slightly longer than 2.488(1) Å for stannylene iron complex [(η 5 -C 5 H 5 )­Fe­(CO)­(PNN)­(SnMe 2 )]­OTf but almost identical with (η 6 -C 7 H 8 )­Fe­(μ-OH)­H­{Sn­[CH­(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 2 } 2 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both values are closely comparable to the related complex [(η 6 -C 7 H 8 ) (μ-OH)(H)Fe{Sn[CH(SiMe 3 ) 2 ] 2 } 2 ]. 47 The yaw angles for (( DIPP C) 2 CH 2 ) in 9 (average 7.0°) confirm the absence of significant strain in the metallacycle. 43,48,49 The Fe-C(carbene) bonds (1.966(5) and 1.970(5) Å) are unremarkable for octahedral Fe II , 50 whilst the B-C bond length (1.647(10) Å) is elongated again indicating steric weakening of the B-C bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%