1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80204-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroxyapatite motility implants in ocular prosthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] HA is widely used in reconstructive surgery as an artificial biomaterial, such as in synthetic auditory ossicle (Apaceram), 1 artificial eyes, 2 artificial tooth roots, 3 and artificial knees. 4 However, there is limited understanding of the cellular and tissue response to HA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] HA is widely used in reconstructive surgery as an artificial biomaterial, such as in synthetic auditory ossicle (Apaceram), 1 artificial eyes, 2 artificial tooth roots, 3 and artificial knees. 4 However, there is limited understanding of the cellular and tissue response to HA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large volume deficiency, the inherent weakness of the supporting eyelid musculature and a large prosthesis resulted in tilting of the prosthesis posteriorly and inferior settling leading to long‐term aesthetic problems. This migration produced a deep superior sulcus and ptosis of the superior lid, enophthalmia, dystopia and ptosis of the ocular prosthesis; and eventual sagging of the inferior lid and lateral canthus 21 . Motility implants are now used in an attempt to overcome these problems.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many patients decline the secondary peg procedure because the movement produced by the primary implant alone is satisfactory (Cowper, 1995;Edelstein et al, 1997). In addition to escalating costs, some studies have reported peg-related complication rates as high as 45% (Pacheco et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%