“…While the performance of concrete at high temperatures, such as fire events, is well known and established in standards, there is a lack of knowledge on the response of concreteto long term cyclic thermal fatigue, andonly a few papers have been published [3][4][5][6].The risk of explosions during operation cannot be ignored [7].Concrete exposed to high temperatures follows a series of physico-chemical changes [8], such as the dehydration of cement paste that results in mechanical losses and the generation of cracks. The selection of adequate concrete components, the cement type (such as Portland cement with the addition of supplementary minerals), and aggregate type (the size distribution and the chemical composition) are fundamental in the design of a concrete that can resist high temperatures [8][9][10].The major concerns in relation to the use of concrete for heat storage in aCSP is failure due to the risk of explosion, and its stability during the repetitive heatcharge and discharge cycles.The type of binder and aggregate chosen have been shown to affect the cycling thermal resistance of concrete [5,6] but cracking control and mechanical integrity needs more improvement.Regarding the design of thermal concrete for STE use, several alternatives have been suggested to improve the resistance of concrete to thermal fatigue: The use of suitable components [4,6], such as cement and aggregates with low expansion and appropriate size distribution and the incorporation of fibers [8,[11][12][13][14].Fiber reinforced concretes (FRC) are increasingly used. The incorporation of fibers to reinforce the concrete matrix is also beneficial for concrete exposed to high temperatures [11].…”