Hymenoplasty and Muslim Patients: Islamic Ethico-Legal Perspectives

Abstract

Background Hymenoplasty, commonly called “revirginization,” is a controversial procedure that pushes the scope of medical practice to satisfy cultural and/or religious “needs.” Aim To outline the sociocultural contexts underlying patient requests for hymenoplasty and present Islamic juridical views on the moral status of hymenoplasty for Muslim patients. Methods Narrative review of the extant bioethics literature and leading Islamic ethico-legal verdicts. Outcomes We identified “Western” and Islamic bioethical debates on hymenoplasty and the critical concepts that underpin ethical justifications for and against the procedure. Results From a Western-ethics perspective, the life-saving potential of the procedure is weighed against the role of the surgeon in directly assisting in a deception and in indirectly promoting cultural practices of sexual inequality. From an Islamic bioethical vantage point, jurists offer two opinions. The first is that the surgery is always impermissible. The second is that although the surgery is generally impermissible, it can become licit when the risks of not having postcoital bleeding harm are sufficiently great. Clinical Implications Patient requests for hymenoplasty should be approached by surgeons with a willingness to understand patients' social contexts and reasons for pursuing the procedure and are ethically justified by leading Islamic jurists in particular circumstances. Strengths and Limitations This article presents emic and etic perspectives on hymenoplasty in Muslim patients, although our review of the Islamic bioethical stances might have missed some juridical opinions and important considerations. Further, Muslims, even devout ones, might not be beholden to Islamic juridical views on medical procedures and thus physicians should not make assumptions about the rationale for, and ethical views of, patients seeking hymenoplasty. Conclusion This article provides critical insight into how Muslim patients, and Islamic jurists, evaluate the moral contexts of hymenoplasty.

Issues on intellectual property as a jointly acquired property

“…In fact, jointly acquired property does not contradict the teachings of Islam (Ibrahim, 1999). Although this concept is not specifically discussed by the previous scholars, but the description of such property was known as Mata' al-Bayt which means household appliances and Mal al-Zawjain as property of husband and wife in discussing the concept of jointly acquired property (Grassa & Gazdar, 2014;Bawany & Padela, 2017).…”

A Review of Aesthetic Gynecologic Procedures for Women

“…Many cultures and religions have traditional beliefs that a bride should be a virgin. Bridal virginity is particularly important in regions where patriarchy is the dominant culture (Bawany & Padela, 2017). To uphold the family reputation, Muslim and Arab communities allow for the execution of a sexually active, unmarried woman (Press Trust of India, 2010).…”

Hi̇menoplasti̇den Sonra: Hi̇menoplasti̇ Sonrasi İyi̇leşme Süreci̇nde Devi̇ni̇msi̇zli̇k Alani Ve Neoli̇beral (Na)baki̇re Kadinin İnşasi

“…Türkiye'de himenoplastiye dair tıp literatürü, dünyanın geri kalanının aksine (örneğin Bawany ve Padela, 2017;Cook ve Dickens, 2009;Dobson, 2008;O'Connor, 2008) etik tartışmalardan uzak dururken sosyal bilimler literatürü ise henüz inşa edilmektedir. Bu makale de özellikle bu konuda Türkçe kaynakların azlığı göz önüne alınarak literatüre katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.…”