PurposeTo provide a historical look at the development of web versions of reference materials and discuss what makes an easy-to-use and useful electronic handbook.
Design/methodology/approachElectronic reference materials were limited to handbooks available on the web. Observations and assumptions about usability are tested with an information retrieval test for specific tasks in print and online editions of the same texts.
FindingsRecommended adoption of those elements which create a well designed book in combination with robust search capabilities and online presentation result in an easy-to-use and useful electronic reference source.
Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size that was used for testing limits the ability to draw conclusions, and is used only as an indication of the differences between models. A more thorough look at difference between electronic book aggregates, such as ENGnetBASE, Knovel ® and Referex would highlight the best features for electronic reference materials.
Practical implicationsAdvantages to particular models for electronic reference publishing are discussed, raising awareness for product evaluation. Areas of development for electronic reference book publishers 2 or providers are identified. Work in these areas would help ensure maximum efficiency through cross title searching via metasearching and data manipulation.
Originality/valueThe paper presents results from some human computer interaction studies about electronic books which have been implemented in a web interface, and the positive effects achieved.
[ARTICLE BEGINS]The Evolution of Electronic Reference Sources INTRODUCTION The ease with which electronic reference materials can be used is increasing, as development moves beyond a static representation of the print edition and begins exploiting the capabilities of the electronic environment. Presented here is an overview of the history and development of web-based handbooks and what may be driving some of the decisions behind the online options some publishers are offering. Technology has progressed to a point where electronic information is at less of a disadvantage and more materials are becoming available online. (Webster, 2003) User preference seems to be for electronic information whenever they can get it. (Lehto, Zhu & Carpenter, 1995;Marcum, 2003;Gray & Langley, 2002) Development of online materials during the last 8 years, particularly reference materials, compelled the discussion of why people would use an electronic version that appears to take longer to access than the print, and may not be as easy to use. When a resource is available on the desktop it can save a trip to the library, and therefore be perceived as saving time. This article examines why electronic may be preferable in some situations and not others. Discussion is not restricted to locating information online, but includes reading and using the data as well.The literature about electronic resources includes articles discussing user interface and usability, (Tennant, 1999;Nielsen & No...