2020
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2020.20.3561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperbolicity of link complements in Seifert-fibered spaces

Abstract: Let s γ be a link in a Seifert-fibered space M over a hyperbolic 2-orbifold O that projects injectively to a filling multi-curve of closed geodesics γ in O. We prove that the complement M s γ of s γ in M admits a hyperbolic structure of finite volume and give combinatorial bounds of its volume.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best‐known lower bound appears in [16, 36, 37], where the bound is given in terms of the number of homotopy classes of arcs of Γ$\Gamma$ after cutting S$S$ open along any multicurve m$\mathfrak {m}$ and taking the maximum over such m$\mathfrak {m}$. While this lower bound is shown to be sharp for some families of non‐simple closed curves on the modular surface [37], it is always at most 6false(3g+nfalse)false(3g3+nfalse)$6(3g + n)(3g -3 + n)$ whenever Γ$\Gamma$ is composed entirely of simple closed curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The best‐known lower bound appears in [16, 36, 37], where the bound is given in terms of the number of homotopy classes of arcs of Γ$\Gamma$ after cutting S$S$ open along any multicurve m$\mathfrak {m}$ and taking the maximum over such m$\mathfrak {m}$. While this lower bound is shown to be sharp for some families of non‐simple closed curves on the modular surface [37], it is always at most 6false(3g+nfalse)false(3g3+nfalse)$6(3g + n)(3g -3 + n)$ whenever Γ$\Gamma$ is composed entirely of simple closed curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we show that this special case is coarsely comparable to the general setting using topological arguments. It is important to note that unlike the lower bound in [16, 36], our bounds control the volume of the thick‐part of NtrueΓ̂$N_{\widehat {\Gamma }}$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A direct proof of such a comparison was later given by Brock-Bromberg [BB16] and Kojima-McShane [KM18]. Pants distance has also been related to volumes of hyperbolic 3-manifolds in another setting by Cremaschi, Rodríguez-Migueles and Yarmola [CRMY19], see also [RM20,CRM20]. In forthcoming work, Landry, Minsky, and Taylor study stretch factors of end-periodic homeomorphisms arising from depth one foliations [LMT21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%