2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3027610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HyperBSA: A High-Performance Consortium Blockchain Storage Architecture for Massive Data

Abstract: With the considerable exploration of blockchain in various industrial fields, the storage architectures of mainstream consortium blockchains exhibit significant performance limitations, which can't meet the requirements of efficient data access with massive data storage in enterprise-level business scenarios. In this paper, we creatively divided the underlying data of the consortium blockchain into two categories: continuous data and state data and proposed a new storage architecture to store and operate these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has the feasibility of commercial implementation as a form of combining BT with business in various fields, enabling the circulation of data such as transaction assets and providing credible services to various customers. However, there are still obvious performance bottlenecks in the existing consortium chain technology (Chen et al, 2020). At the same time, there are still significant limitations in data interaction with public chains (Buterin, 2016).In short, in the blockchain 1.0 era, people bought and sold cryptocurrencies for the difference in return and did not link cryptocurrencies to the value of applications and the digital ecology of the blockchain system.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the feasibility of commercial implementation as a form of combining BT with business in various fields, enabling the circulation of data such as transaction assets and providing credible services to various customers. However, there are still obvious performance bottlenecks in the existing consortium chain technology (Chen et al, 2020). At the same time, there are still significant limitations in data interaction with public chains (Buterin, 2016).In short, in the blockchain 1.0 era, people bought and sold cryptocurrencies for the difference in return and did not link cryptocurrencies to the value of applications and the digital ecology of the blockchain system.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, unlike [13] in the proposed system, data access and processing are made transparent, as the end-user does not know about all the processes required to split files or to combine files' blocks, or how to get the file from the erasure code if a part is lost, etc. Additionally, unlike HyperBSA [15], in this research it is assumed that the system treats data equally, as there's only one type of data to be processed. Unlike DADS [14], our solution combines companies' servers with a blockchain network in order to store files, and it provides control over data accessing methods (the way data is updated or deleted, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HyperBSA [15] is a solution that suggests caching files which are accessed the most, using a new caching algorithm LBN which manages memory space using HashMap. Additionally, it splits data into two categories, state and continuous data, and then it handles each type separately.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 4 depicts an example of various access policies (read, write and approve) on a consortium Blockchain as executed by other Blockchain types, such as public and private [96]. However, the consortium Blockchain's consensus mechanism is run by those specific nodes that are initially defined to control and maintain the Blockchain setup [97].…”
Section: Consortium Blockchainmentioning
confidence: 99%