Hypercompetition: a review and agenda for future research

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to review and understand the dimensionality of hypercompetition, factors causing a hypercompetitive environment and the consequences of hypercompetition on markets. Thereby, the purpose of the study is to cover the main contributors in the research field of hypercompetition and explore their findings and different views on hypercompetition. Design/methodology/approach Systematically review 131 conceptual and empirical studies published or presented at a conference in the past 25 years, with the focus on the definitions, causes and consequences (or presumed effects) of hypercompetition. In the paper, I follow the well-known systematic literature review method by Tranfield et al. (2003). Findings The contribution of the study is to advance the knowledge of researchers and managers, in such a way that it becomes easier for them to select relevant variables to measure hypercompetition and identify strategies for gaining temporary competitive advantages in hypercompetitive environments. The construct of hypercompetition required a consolidation of commonalities in the definitions and characteristics used by scholars, to ensure that proper assumptions and variables are being used to measure hypercompetition in future research. Several ways to measure the effects of hypercompetition on firms, industries and individuals have been proposed, but the field still lacks of a clear definition on how to directly measure the construct. Practical implications In this paper, I highlight three managerial implications of hypercompetition as follows: action-based strategy, the determinants of hypercompetition and the importance for managers of accurately establishing their firm’s competitive situation. Originality/value Previous reviews in the area have either focussed on specific components or effects of hypercompetition. The present study collectively takes into consideration the definitions, causes and consequences of hypercompetition on firms, industries and individuals. The contribution of the paper is to indicate future opportunities and challenges within research on hypercompetition.

Determining the role of emotions in the customer journey for culture industries under conditions of information and communication technologies development

“…The indicators given in Table 3 characterize the quality of the calculated statistical model, as well as the direction and closeness of communication. In this case, the coefficient of determination R 2 shows which part of the variation of the dependent variable is explained by model (1) The main problem is awareness and communication of the availability of cultural products and events in their area…”

“…To reflect multidimensional, dynamic, and aggressive competition, the term "hyper-competition" is used. It points to a situation where market actors are increas-ingly exposed to the cumulative influence of previously isolated competitive factors [1]. This state of affairs led to the search for the latest effective solutions from both business and non-profit organizations.…”

Incumbent Business Model Innovation Under Misperceived Hypercompetition

“…Since then, there have been a handful of large-scale empirical studies trying to ascertain whether other industries, including in other parts of the world, are becoming hypercompetitive, as some have suggested (see e.g. Lindskov, 2021;McNamara, Vaaler, & Devers, 2003;Vaaler & McNamara, 2010). The evidence is mixed, suggesting that hypercompetition is not a universal phenomenon, but one that is limited in industry, geographical space, and time (Lindskov, Sund, & Dreyer, 2021).…”

Magnitude of digital adaptability role: Stakeholder engagement and costless signaling in enhancing sustainable MSME performance

“…Furthermore, food and beverage MSMEs must deal with market unpredictability and volatility [ 23 , 36 ]. Uncertainty and market instability generated by short product life cycles, short product design cycles, new technologies, unexpected product/service entrance, incumbent repositioning, and radical redefining [ 37 ].…”