2009
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2009.2022650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypercomplex Quality Assessment of Multi/Hyperspectral Images

Abstract: This letter presents a novel image quality index which extends the Universal Image Quality Index for monochrome images to multispectral and hyperspectral images through hypercomplex numbers. The proposed index is based on the computation of the hypercomplex correlation coefficient between the reference and tested images, which jointly measures spectral and spatial distortions. Experimental results, both from true and simulated images, are presented on spaceborne and airborne visible/infrared images. The result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative comparison of the data was undertaken using the Q2 n metric that quantifies the average spatial and spectral distortion between any number of bands between two images [53]. The Q2 n metric is a single value bounded between 0 and 1 (where higher values indicate greater quality and less distortion) and is an extension of the single band universal image quality index (UQI) [54].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative comparison of the data was undertaken using the Q2 n metric that quantifies the average spatial and spectral distortion between any number of bands between two images [53]. The Q2 n metric is a single value bounded between 0 and 1 (where higher values indicate greater quality and less distortion) and is an extension of the single band universal image quality index (UQI) [54].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first procedure compared the fused imagery generated from the degraded MS and PAN images of the two sensors with the corresponding original MS images according to Wald's protocol [47]. Three comprehensive indices, the Erreur Relative Globale Adimensionnell de Synthèse (ERGAS) [48], the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) [49,50] and Q2 n [51,52], which is a generalization of the Universal Image Quality Index (UIQI) for monoband images and derived from the theory of hypercomplex numbers, particularly of 2 n -ones, were employed to do this. These indices estimate the global spectral quality of the fused images.…”
Section: Test Data Fusion Methods For Comparison and Evaluation Critmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a final quality metric we use Q2 n , an extension of the Universal Image Quality Index (UQI) from single-band to multispectral/hyperspectral images, based on hypercomplex numbers [37]. The Q2 n takes on values between −1 (worst) and 1 (best).…”
Section: Error Metrics and Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%