2003
DOI: 10.1002/qua.10760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperconjugation effects of hydroxyl and amine groups on chemical shifts of neighboring carbon nuclei

Abstract: Systematic investigations of conformational effects of the hydroxyl group on carbon or hydrogen chemical shifts of different types of alcohols reveal that, besides stereoelectronic effects, hyperconjugation with lone pairs may have a strong influence. In view of the growing use of chemical shifts in probing the structure of biologic molecules, we employed DFT/GIAO/NBO calculations at the B3LYP level for conformers obtained from partial optimization of structures resulting from 30°variations of the COCOXOH (XAO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of LP(2) to the chemical shift of C 3 is much larger, deshielding this nucleus by almost 2.5 ppm at 60° and 270°. Thus, the angular dependence of non-Lewis contributions of both lone pairs on oxygen is in good agreement with our previous interpretations based on hyperconjugative interactions. , Those of LP(2) to the chemical shifts of C 1 and C 3 are stronger, probably owing to its better overlap with the antibonding σ* orbital of the adjacent C−C bond.
7 Variations of non-Lewis contributions from oxygen lone pairs, LP(1) and LP(2), respectively, to natural chemical shieldings of C 1 and C 3 in 2- endo -norborneol with the C 3 −C 2 −O−H dihedral angle.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contribution of LP(2) to the chemical shift of C 3 is much larger, deshielding this nucleus by almost 2.5 ppm at 60° and 270°. Thus, the angular dependence of non-Lewis contributions of both lone pairs on oxygen is in good agreement with our previous interpretations based on hyperconjugative interactions. , Those of LP(2) to the chemical shifts of C 1 and C 3 are stronger, probably owing to its better overlap with the antibonding σ* orbital of the adjacent C−C bond.
7 Variations of non-Lewis contributions from oxygen lone pairs, LP(1) and LP(2), respectively, to natural chemical shieldings of C 1 and C 3 in 2- endo -norborneol with the C 3 −C 2 −O−H dihedral angle.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4 In this region, the C 1 -C 2 bond reaches its maximum length at a C 3 -C 2 -OH dihedral angle of 180°( Figure 6). In this conformation, overlap between the lone pair in a p orbital corresponding to LP(2) and the antibonding orbital on C 1 is most favorable and σ* backdonation is strongest, lengthening the C 1 -C 2 bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, this should be dependent mainly on the distances and orientations of the two species. The intermolecular interaction calculated in the present case is on the same magnitude of intramolecular interactions associated to hyperconjugation that we have calculated elsewhere [40].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The very small residual energetic and charge contributions in saturated systems are largely due to delocalized, non-covalent interactions between bonding and antibonding orbitals of the NBO approach. This noncovalent bonding-antibonding interaction gives the quantitative description of hyperconjugation [40]. In terms of the NBO approach this is expressed by means of the secondorder perturbation interaction energy (E (2) ) involving neighboring orbitals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ethylamine, the use of the switching function causes the potential energy to overshoot the MM3 energy of the dissociated radical by about 7 kJ/mole. While it is possible that use of larger a in the switching function would force the PES curve down, it may also be that the evolving radical is resonance-stabilized by the lone pair on the nitrogen atom [31,32]. In any case, it appears likely that a more accurate model representation could be obtained by adjusting the forcefield parameters to provide a better description of the radical species.…”
Section: Testing Transferability Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%