1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81969-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine Interactions of Excited Nuclei in Atomic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their ordering follows from the relative intensities within a given cascade. Since γ -ray angular distributions were found to be nearly isotropic within statistical uncertainties, presumably as a result of de-orientation as the ions recoil into vacuum [29], it was not possible to obtain useful information on transition multipolarities. However, γ -ray intensity balances were used to extract total electronconversion coefficients, α T , in order to distinguish between E1, M1 or E2 character for transitions with energies below about 250 keV for which the conversion coefficients are significantly different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their ordering follows from the relative intensities within a given cascade. Since γ -ray angular distributions were found to be nearly isotropic within statistical uncertainties, presumably as a result of de-orientation as the ions recoil into vacuum [29], it was not possible to obtain useful information on transition multipolarities. However, γ -ray intensity balances were used to extract total electronconversion coefficients, α T , in order to distinguish between E1, M1 or E2 character for transitions with energies below about 250 keV for which the conversion coefficients are significantly different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%