1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02395979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine interactions-un peu d'histoire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy difference between these two sublevels is the quadrupole splitting ∆E Q . In general, for asymmetric field gradients at the nucleus, we have For the ground state of the free Fe 2+ ion 5 D, the valence contribution to the EFG tensor is dominant 37 and can be expressed in terms of equivalent operators L ij as follows [38][39][40] In eq 11, 1 -R is the Sternheimer factor 36 and 〈r -3 〉 is the mean value of r -3 for 3d electrons. 39,40 The expectation values 〈L ij 〉 are evaluated for the orbital ferrous ground state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy difference between these two sublevels is the quadrupole splitting ∆E Q . In general, for asymmetric field gradients at the nucleus, we have For the ground state of the free Fe 2+ ion 5 D, the valence contribution to the EFG tensor is dominant 37 and can be expressed in terms of equivalent operators L ij as follows [38][39][40] In eq 11, 1 -R is the Sternheimer factor 36 and 〈r -3 〉 is the mean value of r -3 for 3d electrons. 39,40 The expectation values 〈L ij 〉 are evaluated for the orbital ferrous ground state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct determination of the nuclear moments of atoms with unpaired electrons is challenging due to the strong magnetic field at the nucleus caused by these electrons. On the other hand this is advantageous, e.g., to obtain sensitively detailed information about the paramagnetism of the respective sample by means of the magnetic resonance in the GHz range [50,53,54,55,56,57]. Nevertheless it has to be considered that exchange interactions [36] average out the hyperfine structure on magnetically undiluted samples [51].…”
Section: Electron Spin Resonance (Esr) and Relations To Isotope Efmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation between states 1 and 2 is 28 MHz in Fig. 1b and corresponds to the so-called pseudo-nuclear Zeeman effect 9 . For a field strength of 140 G one would expect a splitting of 0.7 MHz between level 1 and 2 by a pure nuclear Zeeman effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%