2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine mixing in semileptonic decay of doubly heavy baryons

Abstract: We qualitatively corroborate the results of W. Roberts and M. Pervin in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 2401 according to which hyperfine mixing greatly affects the decay widths of b → c semileptonic decays involving doubly heavy bc baryons. However, our predictions for the decay widths of the unmixed states differ from those reported in the work of Roberts and Pervin by a factor of 2, and this discrepancy translates to the mixed case. We further show that the predictions of heavy quark spin symmetry, might be used … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

14
51
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[3] and [4]. Our study on the semileptonic decay widths of bc baryons qualitatively corroborate the findings of Roberts and Pervin.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3] and [4]. Our study on the semileptonic decay widths of bc baryons qualitatively corroborate the findings of Roberts and Pervin.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Mixed bc states are obtained by diagonalizing the corresponding mass matrices. In our calculation, the mixed states and masses are given by [3] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] in the framework of the potential approach and QCD sum rules 1 . Since the modulus of the Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements |V cs |, |V cd | are much larger than |V cb |, one would expect the decay widths for c → s, d semileptonic decay of cb baryons to be much larger than the corresponding b → c driven decays which have been more extensively studied in the literature [1,[4][5][6][7][8]. However, this is corrected by a smaller available phase space, and the decay widths for c → s transitions turn out to be larger but of the same order of magnitude as the b → c decay widths, while widths for c → d transitions are much smaller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quark model masses in Table I have been taken from our previous works in Refs. [8,15], where they were obtained using the AL1 potential of Refs. [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation