2011
DOI: 10.1142/s0129055x11004369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine Splitting of the Dressed Hydrogen Atom Ground State in Non-Relativistic Qed

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a spin-1 2 electron and a spin-1 2 nucleus interacting with the quantized electromagnetic field in the standard model of non-relativistic QED. For a fixed total momentum sufficiently small, we study the multiplicity of the ground state of the reduced Hamiltonian. We prove that the coupling between the spins of the charged particles and the electromagnetic field splits the degeneracy of the ground state.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1], using a contradiction argument, we proved under this assumption that the multiplicity of the ground state is strictly less than 4. This shows that a hyperfine splitting does occur in non-relativistic QED (we refer the reader to the introduction of [1] for a more detailed discussion on the hyperfine structure of Hydrogen). Refining our previous analysis, we shall prove in the present paper that the ground state of the dressed Hydrogen atom is unique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [1], using a contradiction argument, we proved under this assumption that the multiplicity of the ground state is strictly less than 4. This shows that a hyperfine splitting does occur in non-relativistic QED (we refer the reader to the introduction of [1] for a more detailed discussion on the hyperfine structure of Hydrogen). Refining our previous analysis, we shall prove in the present paper that the ground state of the dressed Hydrogen atom is unique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It suffices to introduce the expression (1.8) of W g,≥σ (P ) into the operator Π 0,≥σ W g,≥σ (P ) K 0,≥σ (P ) − E g,≥σ (P ) −1 Π0,≥σ W g,≥σ (P )Π 0,≥σ , and next to estimate each term separately. An explicit computation then leads directly to the statement of the lemma (see the proof of Lemma A.9 in [1] for more details).…”
Section: Existence Of a Gap For Large Enough Infrared Cutoffsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations