1968
DOI: 10.1021/ja01016a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine splittings from naturally occurring sulfur-33 in electron paramagnetic resonance spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent triplet-singlet conversion allows for the radical pair to combine and thus form a polysulfide (RSSS n R) product. Such products that are formed through the triplet pathway are therefore enriched in 33 S. Our mechanism is supported by prior ESR measurements (24,25), which show that disulfide radicals have 33 S hyperfine structure values (∼10 G) similar to sulfur nuclei that exhibit MIE. The experimental products also preserve evidence for significant mixing and classical isotope effects that influence Δ 36 S in a mass-dependent manner (21,23), supporting this small anomaly as the cause of 36 S variation reported in ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequent triplet-singlet conversion allows for the radical pair to combine and thus form a polysulfide (RSSS n R) product. Such products that are formed through the triplet pathway are therefore enriched in 33 S. Our mechanism is supported by prior ESR measurements (24,25), which show that disulfide radicals have 33 S hyperfine structure values (∼10 G) similar to sulfur nuclei that exhibit MIE. The experimental products also preserve evidence for significant mixing and classical isotope effects that influence Δ 36 S in a mass-dependent manner (21,23), supporting this small anomaly as the cause of 36 S variation reported in ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The mechanistic aspects for the origin of 33 S anomalies via disulfide ion-radical pair reaction routes have been proposed through multiple sulfur isotope measurements and 33 S electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopic evidence (24,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a higher concentration spectrum (~10 -3 M), the hyperfine splitting was lost but the signal caused by M s = ± 3/2 of 33 S (natural isotopic abundance, 0.75%) became observable. The obtained value of a s was 0.86 mT (29), which was smaller than that (0.92 mT) for thianthrene radical cation (23' + ) (30). This result indicates that the spin density on the sulfur atom of 21" + is lower than that of 23" + and therefore the BCO units are even more effective than the fused benzene rings in delocalizing not only the positive charge but also spin density.…”
Section: Dithiinsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This idea has been criticized on the grounds that the promotion energy p -+ d is expected to be too high in divalent sulphur to allow a significant participation of the d orbitals to the 7r bonding [5]. However, both models were employed in the present investigation, using the parameters proposed by Sullivan [6] for the p model: as = ~ + 1.20fi and ties = 0"65fi; and those suggested by Longuet-Higgins [2] for the d model, where the sulphur atom closely resembles an ethylene molecule: ~' = c~ee , fi'= fiec and ties = 0"8flee. The effect of twisting the phenyl groups was accounted for by using the expression fi(O)= fi cos O, 0 being the angle of the out-of-plane rotation.…”
Section: Molecular Orbital Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the carbon atoms in the heterocyclic ring can display sufficiently high constants to match the experimental values. Because of molecular symmetry the 41.5 M~z coupling was assigned to the carbon atom in position 4 and therefore the 28.6 MrIz coupling had to be attributed to the four remaining carbons (2,3,5,6), which are then accidentally degenerate. The calculated values are 28.3 and 29.2 for C(4) and -26.4 and -26.9 for C(3), C(5) whether the p or the d orbital model is used.…”
Section: Molecular Orbital Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%