1995
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/28/1/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine structure modifications of collisional losses from light-force atom traps

Abstract: Inelastic atomic collisions constitote loss mechanihms for neutral atom traps. and the study of trap-loss rates may provide detailed information on the long-range interaction behueen atoms and on the dynamics of very slow collisions. Gallagher and Pritchard have given a simple two-state model for such collisions which includes a radiative transition or a single curve crossing at short range representing, for example. fine-structurechanging collisions. In order to better describe the more complicated case found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We model this phenomenon using a simple description of molecular dynamics, inspired from [36,40,39]. The large electron spin of Dysprosium leads to an intricate structure of 2(2J + 1)(2J + 1) = 646 molecular potential curves that we calculated numerically.…”
Section: Atom Losses Due To Light-assisted Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We model this phenomenon using a simple description of molecular dynamics, inspired from [36,40,39]. The large electron spin of Dysprosium leads to an intricate structure of 2(2J + 1)(2J + 1) = 646 molecular potential curves that we calculated numerically.…”
Section: Atom Losses Due To Light-assisted Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where τ is a constant. Lett et al [54] have derived an improved but more complicated expression for S, but they also ignored E. A comparison with fully quantum numerical simulations, however, indicates that E does play a role, and it should not be disregarded too lightly [39]. Of course, the integral can be easily evaluated numerically [12,55], but for comparisons with experimental data it is useful to have simple analytic expressions, especially if the actual values for some parameters are not completely known.…”
Section: Quasistatic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the weak field limit it is usually easy to extend the above two-state models to cover multistate cases, because most of the curve crossing situations are isolated and can thus be treated independently, as a sequence of multiple crossings. This has been utilized in [46,53,54]. With the complex potential model this is especially simple, and it is not even necessary to assume that we have isolated crossings.…”
Section: Complex Potential Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shielding affects only 6s 1 6s collisions, this indicates that the formation of molecular ions is due only to atom pairs which survive in and collide on the excited-state potentials (EAI). We thus observe the excited-state survival which has long been thought to play an important role in the enhancement of ultracold collisions [13][14][15]. Excitedstate survival in this system does not involve the population of long-lived states (such as the 1u and 2u states in alkali systems), which have been considered in previous work [6,14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We thus observe the excited-state survival which has long been thought to play an important role in the enhancement of ultracold collisions [13][14][15]. Excitedstate survival in this system does not involve the population of long-lived states (such as the 1u and 2u states in alkali systems), which have been considered in previous work [6,14,15]. There is no attractive molecular potential from the 6s 1 6p asymptote with a lifetime more than 20% longer than the 34 ns atomic lifetime [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%