1993
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8547(93)80110-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine structures and isotopic shifts of the Cu D1 and D2 lines measured by high-resolution laser fluorescence spectroscopy with a collimated atomic beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A B Level 1.710 0.0059 -0.008 a P 1.740 0.0106 0.004 a P 1.785 -0.0236 0.0 a P 1.883 0.0374 0.005 b 4 P 1.956 0.0154 -0.002 b 4 P 2.042 0.0205 0.002 a G 2.080 0.0463 0.004 a D 2.137 0.028 -0.0032 a G 2.280 0.0112 0.004 a P 2.328 0.0201 0.0 a P 3.117 0.0253 0.008 z G 3.216 0.0206 0.005 z G 3.252 0.0183 0.006 z G 3.298 0.0049 0.004 z G 3.514 0.0270 -0.002 z F 3.576 0.0258 0.007 z G 3.629 0.0173 0.006 z G 3.632 0.0251 0.00 z 0.042 0.00 y D 5.552 0.0134 0.00 e F 5.663 0.0335 0.005 e F 5.791 0.0287 -0.001 e F 5.839 0.0257 -0.001 e F 5.873 0.0194 -0.001 e F 5.892 0.0360 0.005 f F 5.976 0.0283 0.003 f F 6.341 0.0000 0.0 e H 6.345 0.0000 0.00 e H 6.348 0.0000 0.00 e G 6.462 0.0000 0.00 e H 6.543 0.0000 0.00 e G Article number, page 66 of 76 Heiter et al: Atomic data for the Gaia-ESO Survey Kurucz (2012), Wagner (1955 3.786 0.0169 0.0 -0.0059 0.0181 0.0 0.0132 4p 2 P Hermann et al (1993) Kurucz (2012, Wagner (1955) 3.817 0.0065 -0.0010 -0.0062 0.0069 -0.0009 0.0139 4p 2 P Hermann et al (1993) Kurucz (2012), Wagner (1955 0.0 0.0 -0.006 0.0 0.0 0.013 4d 2 D none Kurucz (2012) Notes. (a) http://kurucz.harvard.edu/atoms/2900/ab290063.dat, http://kurucz.harvard.edu/atoms/2900/ab290065.dat D Höhle et al (1982) 0.235 −3.760 × 10 −2 1.66 × 10 −3 6s a 3 D Höhle et al (1982) 0.244 −6.19 × 10 −4 1.25 × 10 −3 5d 2 a 3 F Höhle et al (1982) 0.321 −3 × 10 −4 1.89 × 10 −3 6s a 3 D Höhle et al (1982) 2.261 4.96 × 10 −3 1.5 × 10 −4 5d y 3 F o Höhle et al (1982) 2.658 1.44 × 10 K Rivest et al (2002) 3.170 2.301 × 10 −2 6p 5 K Rivest et al (2002) 3.363 1.973 × 10 −2 6p 5 K Rivest et al (2002) Article number, page 67 of 76…”
Section: E (Ev)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A B Level 1.710 0.0059 -0.008 a P 1.740 0.0106 0.004 a P 1.785 -0.0236 0.0 a P 1.883 0.0374 0.005 b 4 P 1.956 0.0154 -0.002 b 4 P 2.042 0.0205 0.002 a G 2.080 0.0463 0.004 a D 2.137 0.028 -0.0032 a G 2.280 0.0112 0.004 a P 2.328 0.0201 0.0 a P 3.117 0.0253 0.008 z G 3.216 0.0206 0.005 z G 3.252 0.0183 0.006 z G 3.298 0.0049 0.004 z G 3.514 0.0270 -0.002 z F 3.576 0.0258 0.007 z G 3.629 0.0173 0.006 z G 3.632 0.0251 0.00 z 0.042 0.00 y D 5.552 0.0134 0.00 e F 5.663 0.0335 0.005 e F 5.791 0.0287 -0.001 e F 5.839 0.0257 -0.001 e F 5.873 0.0194 -0.001 e F 5.892 0.0360 0.005 f F 5.976 0.0283 0.003 f F 6.341 0.0000 0.0 e H 6.345 0.0000 0.00 e H 6.348 0.0000 0.00 e G 6.462 0.0000 0.00 e H 6.543 0.0000 0.00 e G Article number, page 66 of 76 Heiter et al: Atomic data for the Gaia-ESO Survey Kurucz (2012), Wagner (1955 3.786 0.0169 0.0 -0.0059 0.0181 0.0 0.0132 4p 2 P Hermann et al (1993) Kurucz (2012, Wagner (1955) 3.817 0.0065 -0.0010 -0.0062 0.0069 -0.0009 0.0139 4p 2 P Hermann et al (1993) Kurucz (2012), Wagner (1955 0.0 0.0 -0.006 0.0 0.0 0.013 4d 2 D none Kurucz (2012) Notes. (a) http://kurucz.harvard.edu/atoms/2900/ab290063.dat, http://kurucz.harvard.edu/atoms/2900/ab290065.dat D Höhle et al (1982) 0.235 −3.760 × 10 −2 1.66 × 10 −3 6s a 3 D Höhle et al (1982) 0.244 −6.19 × 10 −4 1.25 × 10 −3 5d 2 a 3 F Höhle et al (1982) 0.321 −3 × 10 −4 1.89 × 10 −3 6s a 3 D Höhle et al (1982) 2.261 4.96 × 10 −3 1.5 × 10 −4 5d y 3 F o Höhle et al (1982) 2.658 1.44 × 10 K Rivest et al (2002) 3.170 2.301 × 10 −2 6p 5 K Rivest et al (2002) 3.363 1.973 × 10 −2 6p 5 K Rivest et al (2002) Article number, page 67 of 76…”
Section: E (Ev)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The resulting lines are separated by more than a Doppler width, but are resolved only in very high resolution experiments. 13 In addition, the isotope effect for copper ͓ 29 Cu 63 ͑69.09%͒ and 29 Cu 65 ͑30.91%͔͒ doubles the number of lines. Because the hyperfine lines are separated in frequency by more than a Doppler width, the multiplet structure must be explicitly treated in our curve of growth method in order to obtain accurate ground state copper atom densities, even though the hyperfine structure is not resolved at our instrumental resolution.…”
Section: A Hyperfine Structure Of Ground State Copper Absorption Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two isotopes of copper, 57 Cu and 59 Cu, both affected by HFS. The HFS and IS information was taken from Hermann et al (1993), and the ratio of the isotopes seen in the solar system was used. Unfortunately, the S/N in this region is $25, even after co-adding the spectra from overlapping orders.…”
Section: Appendix a Atomic Parameters Oscillator Strengths And Line mentioning
confidence: 99%