2020
DOI: 10.1137/19m1291601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypergraph Clustering Using a New Laplacian Tensor with Applications in Image Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, we have provided a hypergraph modeling method, and a fast spectral clustering algorithm that is connected to the hypergraph cut problems proposed by (Zhou, Huang, and Schölkopf 2006;Ghoshdastidar and Dukkipati 2015;Saito, Mandic, and Suzuki 2018). A future direction would be to explore other constructions of multi-way similarity which can connect to other uniform and nonuniform hypergraph cuts not having kernel characteristics, such as Laplacian tensor ways (Chen, Qi, and Zhang 2017;Chang et al 2020), total variation and its submodular extension (Hein et al 2013;Yoshida 2019). Also, it would be interesting to study more on connections between this work and a general splitting functions of inhomogeneous cut (Li and Milenkovic 2017;Chodrow, Veldt, and Benson 2021), e.g., to see which class of splitting functions can be connected to the biclique kernel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conclude, we have provided a hypergraph modeling method, and a fast spectral clustering algorithm that is connected to the hypergraph cut problems proposed by (Zhou, Huang, and Schölkopf 2006;Ghoshdastidar and Dukkipati 2015;Saito, Mandic, and Suzuki 2018). A future direction would be to explore other constructions of multi-way similarity which can connect to other uniform and nonuniform hypergraph cuts not having kernel characteristics, such as Laplacian tensor ways (Chen, Qi, and Zhang 2017;Chang et al 2020), total variation and its submodular extension (Hein et al 2013;Yoshida 2019). Also, it would be interesting to study more on connections between this work and a general splitting functions of inhomogeneous cut (Li and Milenkovic 2017;Chodrow, Veldt, and Benson 2021), e.g., to see which class of splitting functions can be connected to the biclique kernel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three variants of this; star (Zhou, Huang, and Schölkopf 2006), clique (Rodriguez 2002;Saito, Mandic, and Suzuki 2018), and inhomogeneous (Li and Milenkovic 2017;Veldt, Benson, and Kleinberg 2020;Liu et al 2021). Other ways are total variation (Hein et al 2013;Li and Milenkovic 2018) and tensor modeling for uniform hypergraph (Hu and Qi 2012;Chen, Qi, and Zhang 2017;Chang et al 2020;Dukkipati 2014, 2015). Our approach follows star and clique ways as well as tensor and its graph reduction approach of (Ghoshdastidar and Dukkipati 2015).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the k = 3 case, for example, we would have entry a i,j,k = 1 iff {i, j, k} ∈ E. There are several spectral methods for clustering k-uniform hypergraphs, many of which rely on concepts connected to tensor eigenvalues and eigenvectors [39]. Ke et al [34] use a normalized tensor power iteration to compute eigenvectors, while Chang et al [16] take an explicit optimization approach. Hu and Wang [30] derive a clustering method for uniform hypergraphs based on angular separability, and provide several statistical guarantees.…”
Section: Spectral Clustering Methods For Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measure signal differences among all vertices in each hyperedge by using high-order interactions directly rather than utilizing pairwise interactions extracted from hypergraphs [7,[14][15][16]. We define the initial form of the total variation as…”
Section: Multi-order Total Variation Over a Hypergraphmentioning
confidence: 99%