Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2002.1035287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperion data collection: Performance assessment and science application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to a 30% uniform albedo target (Pearlman et al 2000), these ratios yield an estimated noise equivalent delta reflectance in the VNIR equal to or less than about 0.2%. In addition, a series of lunar and solar calibration collections found VNIR repeatability ,1% (Barry et al 2002). Both measures are well below the 2% upper limit estimated for detecting a few senescing tallow trees.…”
Section: Study Area and Image Collectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to a 30% uniform albedo target (Pearlman et al 2000), these ratios yield an estimated noise equivalent delta reflectance in the VNIR equal to or less than about 0.2%. In addition, a series of lunar and solar calibration collections found VNIR repeatability ,1% (Barry et al 2002). Both measures are well below the 2% upper limit estimated for detecting a few senescing tallow trees.…”
Section: Study Area and Image Collectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We restricted analyses to wavelengths below 1000 nm and, with the exception of nine bands surrounding the spectral overlap region, used only bands of visibly high quality (table 1). Pre-launch and on-orbit calibrations have reported the signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the VNIR ranged from about 140 to 190 (Barry et al 2002). With respect to a 30% uniform albedo target (Pearlman et al 2000), these ratios yield an estimated noise equivalent delta reflectance in the VNIR equal to or less than about 0.2%.…”
Section: Study Area and Image Collectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The most important of these challenges include the time of day of measurements and solar inclination angle, relief characteristics, extent and type of vegetation, and atmospheric obstacles such as humidity and cloud cover. Anticipating this, NASA included many ground truth verification locations in Hyperion's initial paths to ensure effective calibration [58,59] Because of the presence of visible light wavelengths in the examined spectra, the time of day of satellite measurement is certainly a restrictive condition in terms of method applicability. Future analysis should be conducted to test the effectiveness of only using infrared wavelengths to detect arsenic contamination; if the resulting accuracies are reasonably similar to current ones, the impact of time of day can be greatly reduced because of infrared's relative independence from time of day.…”
Section: Limiting Factors Of the Satellite Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance characteristics of Hyperion are shown in Table 3 . The scientists’ range of interests that can achieve good benefit from Hyperion data include: (1) geology; (2) agriculture monitoring; (3) volcanic temperature measurement; (4) study of reef and coral bay health; (5) glaciological applications (Barry et al, 2002 ). Hyperion data have a signal-to-noise ratio about 161/1 in the visible and near infrared and 40/1 in the shortwave infrared region that somewhat limited the scientific applications of Hyperion data (Folkman et al, 2001 ; Thome et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Remote Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%