“…As presented in Figure 1, the process of study selection started with the identification of 213 possibly relevant articles from three distinct databases (52 studies from PubMed, 70 from Scopus, 29 from Web of Science, 62 from Embase), in addition to 10 studies retrieved from the manual search of the included studies' references. In the next step, after removing the duplicate records, 93 articles underwent initial screening based on their title and abstract, of which 58 studies were excluded and the rest of the studies were evaluated for full‐text eligibility, which led to the exclusion of 15 other articles for the following reasons: five technical notes [10, 39, 44, 46, 50], eight articles for having a study population other than interest (LM tear, Wrisberg type of LM or injury in other PLC structures) [6, 9, 13–15, 27, 30, 32], one study for not mentioning the treatment [45], and one study [54] for having the same population with an included article by Zheng et al [53]. Eventually, 20 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis [3, 8, 11, 12, 17, 19, 22, 24, 29, 31, 33–35, 40–43, 49, 53].…”