1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80080-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Problems in diagnosis†

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) 1 is a syndrome caused by sensitization to and repeated inhalation of an inhaled antigen (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). The clinical and laboratory features of the disease have been well defined, but many of the immune mechanisms involved in the development of the disease have not been well defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) 1 is a syndrome caused by sensitization to and repeated inhalation of an inhaled antigen (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). The clinical and laboratory features of the disease have been well defined, but many of the immune mechanisms involved in the development of the disease have not been well defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the above-mentioned indicators, the diagnostic value of serum precipitins has long been controversial [6], particularly because of their lack of sensitivity and, especially, of specificity [7]. These limitations may be due to the use of poorly purified antigens, the lack of the specific inciting antigen in the test panel, inappropriate techniques [8] or, in epidemiological studies, the use of inappropriate control groups [5,9,10]. Despite the pitfalls presented above, a recent multicentre study by LACASSE et al [4] identified serum precipitins as a significant predictor of HP, regardless of exposure (odds ratio 5.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-10.4)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only case report of HP with lovebird exposure presented in a female exposed to a total of eight birds (parrots, parakeets, one cockatoo, one conure and one lovebird), all of them provoked positive precipitins. It is unclear whether the lovebird was partially responsible for the disease in this case [16]. To the current authors' knowledge, there is no previous description of bird fancier's disease exclusively related to lovebird exposure, and they therefore report this new aetiology herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This interrogative detail is essential to establish the diagnosis, as exposure to an offending antigen predicts HP with a very high odds ratio [22]. Furthermore, identification of the possible offending antigen allows a search for specific precipitins using extracts from the patient's environment [22], which is probably more efficient than searching for precipitins against commercial antigens [16]. This dual procedure is very important in the diagnostic process of HP [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%