2017
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2017.2714338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral Image Restoration Using Low-Rank Tensor Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same strategy can also be applied to the endmember tensor if one considers the endmember variabilities to be small or highly correlated in low-dimensional structures within the HI. The low-rank property of HI tensors has been an important tool in the design of hyperspectral image completion [33] and restoration algorithms [34], consisting in one of the main lowdimensional structures that are currently being considered in hyperspectral imaging applications. Thus, assuming that A has a low-rank K A , and that M has a low-rank K M the global cost functional for the unmixing problem can be written as…”
Section: Low-rank Unmixing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same strategy can also be applied to the endmember tensor if one considers the endmember variabilities to be small or highly correlated in low-dimensional structures within the HI. The low-rank property of HI tensors has been an important tool in the design of hyperspectral image completion [33] and restoration algorithms [34], consisting in one of the main lowdimensional structures that are currently being considered in hyperspectral imaging applications. Thus, assuming that A has a low-rank K A , and that M has a low-rank K M the global cost functional for the unmixing problem can be written as…”
Section: Low-rank Unmixing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, experiments are conducted on the synthetic and the real data. The compared methods consist of LRTA [8], BM4D [14], LRMR [4], WSNLRMA [5], and LRTR [10]. The parameters of the compared methods are optimally assigned or selected as suggested in the reference papers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensor tubal rank, based on the tensor singular value decomposition (t-SVD), is magnetic for well characterizing the inherent low-rank structure of a tensor. Tensor nuclear norm (TNN) was considered formulating a low-rank tensor recovery model (LRTR) [10] for effective HSIs denoising. Although TNN as a popular surrogate of the tubal rank has obtained promising results, it is just a suboptimal surrogate of the tubal rank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wealth of spectral information in HSIs has opened new perspectives in different applications, such as target detection, spectral unmixing, object classification, and matching [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The underlying assumption in object classification techniques is that each pixel comprises the response of only one material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the noise levels of Bands 1 and 220 are evidently higher than those of the other three bands, and previous sparse unmixing methods treat all the bands similarly. However, for real HSIs, the noise levels of different bands vary, and bands with high noise levels will dominate the loss function Y − EA 2 F , where Y denotes the collected mixed pixel, E denotes the spectral library, A denotes the abundance matrix, and . F represents the matrix Frobenius norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%