2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63977-6.00018-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral imaging in crop fields: precision agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though not always consistent across growth stage and fertilizer rate, chlorophyll or protein indicators can be used as proxies for N status due to the strong relationship between Ncontaining compounds and N content (Fu et al, 2021). Many different vegetation indices are widely used to estimate crop N content or accumulation, alleviating confounding factors from soils or water, which are generally calculated from the leaf or canopy reflectance values of wavebands in the visible and nearinfrared regions (Zhang et al, 2018;Caballero et al, 2020;Fu et al, 2021). Rapid developments in sensing technologies coupled with machine learning (and other techniques) have increased our abilities to accurately predict yield and non-destructively estimate plant N status (Yao et al, 2015;Chlingaryan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Precision Agriculture and Nuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though not always consistent across growth stage and fertilizer rate, chlorophyll or protein indicators can be used as proxies for N status due to the strong relationship between Ncontaining compounds and N content (Fu et al, 2021). Many different vegetation indices are widely used to estimate crop N content or accumulation, alleviating confounding factors from soils or water, which are generally calculated from the leaf or canopy reflectance values of wavebands in the visible and nearinfrared regions (Zhang et al, 2018;Caballero et al, 2020;Fu et al, 2021). Rapid developments in sensing technologies coupled with machine learning (and other techniques) have increased our abilities to accurately predict yield and non-destructively estimate plant N status (Yao et al, 2015;Chlingaryan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Precision Agriculture and Nuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the image-based VIS/NIR approach, thanks to the combination of spectral information with the spatial and temporal dimensions, it is possible to estimate the occurrence of stressful conditions even at landscape scale (Zhang et al, 2019a ). Spaceborne, airborne and ground-based, help to monitor in real-time the water status, biomass and yield, nutrient status, disease, and pests (Xue and Su, 2017 ; Maes and Steppe, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2019a ; Caballero et al, 2020 ), thanks also to combined elaboration of ground-based hyperspectral collected data with hand-carried radiometers and spectroradiometers and UAVs imaging data (Zheng et al, 2018 ). In Table 2 , an overview of the recent literature about the application of hyperspectral imaging for stress detection has been reported.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Qualitative Methods For Stress Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions are also far more detrimental than a pathogen-induced stress: lack of nutrients, water or hyper salinity can cause up to a 70% reduction in the crop yield (Mantri et al, 2012;Waqas et al, 2019). There are several imaging techniques, such as hyperspectral imaging and thermography, that potentially can be used for an indirect detection of abiotic stresses in plants (Bauer et al, 2019;Caballero et al, 2020). These techniques allow for fast imaging of broad field areas and identification of "problematic areas" (Baena et al, 2017;Lu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%