2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40885-021-00170-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypertension and coronary artery ectasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis study

Abstract: Background Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is characterized by the enlargement of a coronary artery to 1.5 times or more than other non-ectasia parts of the vessel. It is important to investigate the association of different factors and CAE because there are controversial results between available studies. We perform this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of hypertension (HTN) on CAE. Methods To find the potentially relevant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 18 , 19 ] Hypertension and smoking have been demonstrated to be associated with CAE. [ 20 , 21 ] In our research, the proportion of gender and smoking were similar in the 2 groups. In addition, BMI and IVSd were independent risk factors for CAE, which are similar to the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…[ 18 , 19 ] Hypertension and smoking have been demonstrated to be associated with CAE. [ 20 , 21 ] In our research, the proportion of gender and smoking were similar in the 2 groups. In addition, BMI and IVSd were independent risk factors for CAE, which are similar to the previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Several reports showed a gender predominance with a high prevalence of CAE in men (1,18,19). Hypertension, smoking and dyslipidemia, including familial hypercholesterolemia, have also been associated with CAE (20)(21)(22). A higher risk of CAE was also reported among cocaine abusers (23).…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that ACS presenters had a greater frequency of the illness, there was a statistically significant difference in hypertension between the two groups (P=0.004). Contrarily, in their analysis of 3263 people, Bahremand et al (16) observed no statistically significant in the prevalence of hypertension across the groups (P= 0.171).…”
Section: Anterior MImentioning
confidence: 88%