Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Abstract-Race has been considered an important factor in determining blood pressure response to treatment and selection of antihypertensive drug therapy. Data collected during a clinical trial that evaluated rapidity of medication up-titration with blood pressure response to monotherapy with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor quinapril were used to characterize response in 533 black and 2046 white participants. Our objectives were to examine the influence of race and other factors on blood pressure response and to assess the degree to which nonrace factors account for apparent racial differences in response. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses (baseline minus follow-up) to treatment were assessed with treatment groups combined. Crude systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses averaged 4.7 and 2.4 mm Hg less, respectively, in black compared with white participants; however, the response distributions largely overlapped. In multivariate linear regression models adjusted for study design variables and measured participant characteristics, the racial difference in systolic response was reduced by 51% to 2.3 mm Hg, and diastolic response by 21% to 1.9 mm Hg. In these models, participant characteristics, including age, gender, body size, and pretreatment blood pressure severity, significantly predicted either attenuated or enhanced blood pressure response to treatment. Our findings demonstrate that a large source of variability of blood pressure response to treatment is within, not between, racial groups, and that factors that vary at the level of the individual contribute to apparent racial differences in response to treatment. Key Words: ACE inhibitors Ⅲ antihypertensive therapy Ⅲ blood pressure response Ⅲ hypertension Ⅲ race R ace has long been considered an important factor in determining blood pressure (BP) response to treatment, at least to single antihypertensive drugs. [1][2][3][4] More specifically, blacks with hypertension have been reported to be less responsive to monotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, 5 -blockers, 6 -8 and angiotensin receptor blockers 9 than to diuretics and calcium antagonists. Many of these same studies have reported that white hypertensive patients respond better to these antihypertensive agents than do blacks. 10,11,1,3,4 Authoritative treatment guidelines such as the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 12 have acknowledged this evidence of lesser BP response among blacks to certain drug classes and have not dismissed the notion that race be considered when selecting antihypertensive drug therapy.There are concerns, however, with the interpretation of data from these studies. First, black and white hypertensives typically differ on baseline characteristics 13,14 that may confound racial differences in BP response; observed response differences have almost never been adjusted for potential confounding factors other than baseline BP. Second, when racial BP ...
Abstract-Race has been considered an important factor in determining blood pressure response to treatment and selection of antihypertensive drug therapy. Data collected during a clinical trial that evaluated rapidity of medication up-titration with blood pressure response to monotherapy with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor quinapril were used to characterize response in 533 black and 2046 white participants. Our objectives were to examine the influence of race and other factors on blood pressure response and to assess the degree to which nonrace factors account for apparent racial differences in response. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses (baseline minus follow-up) to treatment were assessed with treatment groups combined. Crude systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses averaged 4.7 and 2.4 mm Hg less, respectively, in black compared with white participants; however, the response distributions largely overlapped. In multivariate linear regression models adjusted for study design variables and measured participant characteristics, the racial difference in systolic response was reduced by 51% to 2.3 mm Hg, and diastolic response by 21% to 1.9 mm Hg. In these models, participant characteristics, including age, gender, body size, and pretreatment blood pressure severity, significantly predicted either attenuated or enhanced blood pressure response to treatment. Our findings demonstrate that a large source of variability of blood pressure response to treatment is within, not between, racial groups, and that factors that vary at the level of the individual contribute to apparent racial differences in response to treatment. Key Words: ACE inhibitors Ⅲ antihypertensive therapy Ⅲ blood pressure response Ⅲ hypertension Ⅲ race R ace has long been considered an important factor in determining blood pressure (BP) response to treatment, at least to single antihypertensive drugs. [1][2][3][4] More specifically, blacks with hypertension have been reported to be less responsive to monotherapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, 5 -blockers, 6 -8 and angiotensin receptor blockers 9 than to diuretics and calcium antagonists. Many of these same studies have reported that white hypertensive patients respond better to these antihypertensive agents than do blacks. 10,11,1,3,4 Authoritative treatment guidelines such as the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure 12 have acknowledged this evidence of lesser BP response among blacks to certain drug classes and have not dismissed the notion that race be considered when selecting antihypertensive drug therapy.There are concerns, however, with the interpretation of data from these studies. First, black and white hypertensives typically differ on baseline characteristics 13,14 that may confound racial differences in BP response; observed response differences have almost never been adjusted for potential confounding factors other than baseline BP. Second, when racial BP ...
The efficacy and tolerability of a once-daily, fixed combination of 50 mg atenolol and 20 mg nifedipine slow release were evaluated in a 12-month open study of 27 elderly hypertensives who were either newly presenting patients or were those who were inadequately controlled on previous monotherapy or had unacceptable side-effects with their current therapy. After 1-month's therapy with the combination, the mean sitting blood pressure 1 to 4 hours post-dose decreased from 176/103 mmHg to 146/83 mmHg and was maintained at this level for the remainder of the study. Eight patients complained of side-effects on study entry. Sixteen had complaints at some time during the 12 months of fixed combination treatment and 4 were withdrawn because of side-effects. Dizziness occurred in 6 patients on the combination but, as with side-effects overall, tended to resolve with time; its occurrence did not appear to correlate with the on-treatment blood pressure. In this group of elderly hypertension patients, therefore, the combination therapy with atenolol plus nifedipine slow release appeared to exert a greater antihypertensive effect compared with previous therapy, which included atenolol alone, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis and was reasonably well-tolerated over a 12-month period.
Nifedipine antagonises influx of calcium through cell membrane slow channels, and sustained release formulations of the calcium channel blocker have been shown to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and both stable and variant angina pectoris. Preliminary findings also indicate that these formulations are effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and hypertension in pregnancy, and that they reduce the frequency of ischaemic episodes in some patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The exact mechanism of action of nifedipine in all of these disorders has not been defined. However, its potent peripheral and coronary arterial dilator properties, together with improvements in oxygen supply/demand, are of particular importance. A major goal of sustained release therapy is to permit reductions in the frequency of nifedipine administration, preferably to once daily, and thus improve patient compliance. Two new once-daily formulations--the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and a fixed combination capsule comprising sustained release nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 50 mg--have exhibited marked antihypertensive efficacy. The GITS preparation has also been used effectively in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, and both formulations appear to be well tolerated. Sustained release nifedipine formulations are generally better tolerated than their conventionally formulated counterparts, particularly with regard to reflex tachycardia. Adverse effects seem to be dose related, are mainly associated with the drug's potent vasodilatory action, and include headache, flushing and dizziness. Generally, these effects are mild to moderate in severity and transient, usually diminishing with continued treatment. Thus, sustained release nifedipine formulations are useful and established cardiovascular therapeutic agents which have demonstrable efficacy in various forms of angina, mild to moderate hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Further, promising results shown by the nifedipine GITS formulation, with its advantage of once daily administration suggest that it is likely to become one of the preferred nifedipine formulations for the treatment of hypertension and the various forms of angina.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.