SUMMARYThe effect of antiadrenergic treatment with methyldopa was studied in 17 patients with established essential hypertension who were subdivided with respect to age in a group younger (n = 10; mean age, 47 ± 2.4 (SEM) years; and a group older than 60 years of age (n = 7, mean age, 67 ± 2.8 SEM). The fall in arterial pressure was associated with a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in cardiac output and heart rate in patients over 60 years of age and no change in total peripheral resistance, whereas a (nonsignificant) fall in resistance occurred in younger patients. In both age groups, a significant (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively) decrease in plasma norepinephrine levels was observed, whereas epinephrine and dopamine showed no changes. renergic drug, has been available for more than a quarter of a century as a reliable antihypertensive agent.1 Although its mechanism of action has been elucidated only recently, 1 " 7 controversy still exists regarding its hemodynamic effects. Early studies had indicated that the antihypertensive effect occurs by a reduction in cardiac output, 810 whereas other reports suggested that this was mediated by a decrease in total peripheral resistance.
"15 Since hypertension in the elderly is associated with distinct hemodynamic, fluid volume, and endocrine alterations, 1 " we hypothesized that the age of the patient may significantly influence the mechanisms of the antihypertensive response. Accordingly, the present study was designed to evaluate hemodynamic, circulating humoral, and intravascular volume changes in 17 patients who were subdivided into groups older and younger than 60 years of age.
MethodsSeventeen patients with established essential hypertension were included in the present study. They were subdivided with respect to age in a group younger (n = 10, mean age 47 ± 2.4 (SEM) years) and older than 60 years of age (n = 7, mean age 67 ± 2.8 SEM). Race, sex, body height, weight, and surface area (2.05 ± 0.06 and 1.97 ± 0.1 M 2 ) were similar in the two groups. Antihypertensive treatment was discontinued at least 4 weeks before the study was initiated. The research protocol had been approved previously by our clinical investigation committee and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Two hemodynamic evaluations were performed, the first after the patient had remained off treatment for 4 weeks and the second after the patient had taken methyldopa for 4 to 6 weeks. During the treatment period the dose of methyldopa was titrated in the outpatient department gradually from 250 mg twice a day to a maximum of 2.0 g per day according to the response of arterial pressure. The average dose was 0.9 and 0.6 g per day in the younger and older group respectively. Routine laboratory blood and urine tests as well as pulmonary function studies (pulmodigitalizer) were done 1 day before or after the hemodynamic measurements were made.
11-226by guest on May 10, 2018 http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from