Finding the cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is generally considered to be useful in order to prevent recurrence and subsequent clinical deterioration. As acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a frequent cause of OHCA, several experts claim that resuscitated patients of presumed cardiac cause should undergo immediate coronary angiography with subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) if indicated, regardless of clinical symptoms and/or electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria [1]. This strategy is supported by several strong arguments. First, there is a very high prevalence of coronary lesions in these arrest patients. In a recent metaanalysis, the prevalence of significant coronary artery disease ranged from 59 to 71 % in patients without an obvious non-cardiac aetiology (Table 1) [2]. This high prevalence of recent coronary occlusion provides a strong rationale for performing coronary angiography in OHCA patients with no obvious extra-cardiac cause, in order to detect the culprit lesion. Second, early coronary angiography also enables immediate PCI, when indicated. Since the publication of the pioneering study by Spaulding and co-workers in 1997 [3], many observational studies have reported the feasibility and possible survival benefit from an early invasive approach. In a cohort of 435 OHCA patients without obvious extra-cardiac cause, successful PCI was an independent factor for survival, regardless of the post-resuscitation ECG findings (odds ratio (OR) 2.1 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.7]) [4]. In this issue, Bougouin and colleagues [5] report on the characteristics of 3,816 cases of treated OHCA in Paris; after adjustment for other prognostic factors, coronary angiography was associated with survival (OR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.4-4.0, P = 0.001). As the data are derived from a 'real-life', large, population-based registry, this result underlines that the benefit of early reperfusion is not restricted to specialised 'cardiac arrest centres'. Finally early PCI is also associated with a better long-term outcome: among 1,001 OHCA survivors discharged from hospital in the USA, Dumas and associates reported a 5-year survival of 78.7 % in those treated with PCI compared with 54.4 % in those not treated with PCI (p \ 0.01). Moreover, PCI was associated with a lower risk of death after adjustment for confounders (hazard ratio 0.56 [95 % CI 0.34, 0.61], p \ 0.01) [6]. The benefit of early revascularization may not be restricted to crude survival but could also be associated with an improved quality of life. Specifically focusing on quality of life, daily functioning and participation in social activities, in a long-term follow-up of 63 OHCA survivors (after a mean follow-up of 36 ± 18.8 months) PCI was associated with better cognitive function, participation in social activities and instrumental daily activities compared with patients not treated with PCI [7]. Even in the absence of large randomised studies, it is highly probable that early coronary revascularisation, when required, is associated with a c...