2008
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.157420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperthermia impairs short‐term memory and peripheral motor drive transmission

Abstract: The aims of this study were to determine (i) the effect of passive hyperthermia on motor drive and cognitive function, and (ii) whether head cooling can limit the hyperthermia-induced alterations. Sixteen subjects were randomly exposed for 2 h to three different conditions: control (Con, 20• C), hot (Hot, 50• C) and hot head cool (HHC -where cold packs were applied to the head under Hot conditions). Three cognitive tests measuring attention and two measuring memory were performed. Neuromuscular testing include… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

20
246
7
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(87 reference statements)
20
246
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…30 -50% RH) for 20 -120 min, in which internal temperature either did not change (16,17) or increased to a similar extent as that in the current study (ϳ1.5°C) (16,19,54). As a result, a rationale for our divergent findings is likely the waterperfused suit method with which we induced moderate heat stress.…”
Section: Elevations In Body Temperature and Cognitive Functioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…30 -50% RH) for 20 -120 min, in which internal temperature either did not change (16,17) or increased to a similar extent as that in the current study (ϳ1.5°C) (16,19,54). As a result, a rationale for our divergent findings is likely the waterperfused suit method with which we induced moderate heat stress.…”
Section: Elevations In Body Temperature and Cognitive Functioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…2 and 3, Table 3). This finding is even more surprising given that performance on these exact tests was reduced in heat-stressed younger adults utilizing a similar sample size (range: 8 -18 subjects), e.g., OTS (16,17), RVP (19), PRM (19,54), and SSP (19,54). Thus, we are confident that our findings are not due to a lack of sensitivity, as has been speculated as a confounding factor in other similar studies (e.g., 3,61).…”
Section: Elevations In Body Temperature and Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations