2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00448-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypoalbuminemia predicts inferior outcome in patients with AIDS-related lymphoma

Abstract: Background The prognostic value of serum albumin in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma (ARL) remains covered. Methods We retrospectively analyzed de novo ARL patients from 2013 to 2019 across three centers. Factors correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in Kaplan–Meier, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent negative impact of hypoalbuminemia has been demonstrated previously in a study from China, where patient age also played a significant role in AIDS-related lymphoma outcomes. 35 Survival times were not influenced by patient age ($60 years), Ki-67 levels ($80%), extranodal disease (apart from BMi), COO, or gender in this cohort. Survival rates seemed poorer in the MYC+ cases, but this finding was not statistically significant, possibly because of the limited number of MYC+ cases with survival data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The independent negative impact of hypoalbuminemia has been demonstrated previously in a study from China, where patient age also played a significant role in AIDS-related lymphoma outcomes. 35 Survival times were not influenced by patient age ($60 years), Ki-67 levels ($80%), extranodal disease (apart from BMi), COO, or gender in this cohort. Survival rates seemed poorer in the MYC+ cases, but this finding was not statistically significant, possibly because of the limited number of MYC+ cases with survival data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%