Continuous Media With Microstructure 2 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28241-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypocontinua

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, some papers were published with the aim of formulating a dynamics of continua for which the largely tacit primal axiom of absolute persistence of material elements fails. () The glaring instance of such a body is a gas though the occasional placing of its dynamics within a course of lectures as a chapter of standard continuum mechanics seems to imply the opposite. We quote for all from Truesdell and Muncaster, page 3: “The kinetic gas …is a continuous medium …Not only is the kinetic theory a field theory, but also the kinetic gas is endowed with the very same field descriptors as continuum mechanics …” and in a footnote … “For an elementary introduction to the basic concepts and assumptions of continuum mechanics the reader may consult the book of C.Truesdell, A First Course in Rational Mechanics …” There, the mentioned primal axiom is glossed over (page 36) by a seemingly innocent Axiom of Impenetrability: “In continuum mechanics, contrarily, the mappings χfalse(·,tfalse):scriptBχΩfalse(scriptB,tfalse) is assumed bijective,” professed already also in Truesdell and Toupin .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, some papers were published with the aim of formulating a dynamics of continua for which the largely tacit primal axiom of absolute persistence of material elements fails. () The glaring instance of such a body is a gas though the occasional placing of its dynamics within a course of lectures as a chapter of standard continuum mechanics seems to imply the opposite. We quote for all from Truesdell and Muncaster, page 3: “The kinetic gas …is a continuous medium …Not only is the kinetic theory a field theory, but also the kinetic gas is endowed with the very same field descriptors as continuum mechanics …” and in a footnote … “For an elementary introduction to the basic concepts and assumptions of continuum mechanics the reader may consult the book of C.Truesdell, A First Course in Rational Mechanics …” There, the mentioned primal axiom is glossed over (page 36) by a seemingly innocent Axiom of Impenetrability: “In continuum mechanics, contrarily, the mappings χfalse(·,tfalse):scriptBχΩfalse(scriptB,tfalse) is assumed bijective,” professed already also in Truesdell and Toupin .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when pursuing analogies with the standard theory, we could introduce a mesoscopic displacement gradient in 2 ways: either as the double vector G by mimicking strictly the standard case via integration of Ġ=BG, or by using a distinct differential equation for a double vector G ∗ , which includes the effects of mass gain or loss Ġ=BG12σG. The alternative choice calls for quite different stipulation of the Piola time derivatives of vectors and tensors; we follow here the first choice opposite of that followed in earlier papers,() as details of analysis here become simpler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations