2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypofunction of the dorsal hippocampal NMDA receptors impairs retrieval of memory to partially presented foreground context in a single-trial fear conditioning in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reciprocal positive feedback interactions occur between mGlu5 and NMDA receptors in that activation of NMDA receptors can activate mGluR5-mediated neural responses and vice versa (Doherty et al, 1997;Alagarsamy et al, 1999). Although the role of mGlu5 receptors in memory retrieval is not fully understood, NMDA receptors have been implicated in memory retrieval in animal models of fear conditioning (Melik et al, 2006;Matus-Amat et al, 2007) and spatial working memory (Yoshihara and Ichitani, 2004). Thus, functional blockade of mGluR5 may have impeded NMDA receptor-mediated effects on the retrieval of rewardrelated memory, thereby resulting in the observed decrease produced by MTEP of conditioned reinstatement induced by both the cocaine and SCM S ϩ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reciprocal positive feedback interactions occur between mGlu5 and NMDA receptors in that activation of NMDA receptors can activate mGluR5-mediated neural responses and vice versa (Doherty et al, 1997;Alagarsamy et al, 1999). Although the role of mGlu5 receptors in memory retrieval is not fully understood, NMDA receptors have been implicated in memory retrieval in animal models of fear conditioning (Melik et al, 2006;Matus-Amat et al, 2007) and spatial working memory (Yoshihara and Ichitani, 2004). Thus, functional blockade of mGluR5 may have impeded NMDA receptor-mediated effects on the retrieval of rewardrelated memory, thereby resulting in the observed decrease produced by MTEP of conditioned reinstatement induced by both the cocaine and SCM S ϩ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, NMDAR stimulation is necessary for the retrieval or expression of spatial, inhibitory avoidance, and trace fear memory (Corcoran et al, 2011;Matus-Amat et al, 2007;Melik et al, 2006;Quinn et al, 2005;Rodrigues et al, 2001), but not contextual fear memory (Fellini et Pound sign represents significant difference relative to all other time points (ANOVA time simple main effect, Tukey test, po0.05). Yoshihara and Ichitani, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the subunits, NR2A and NR2B subunits are predominantly expressed in excitatory neurons in adult forebrain regions including hippocampus and cortex, which are believed to play essential roles in learning and memory (Furukawa et al, 2005;Monyer et al, 1994). NMDARs hypofunction was found to cause memory defects (Melik et al, 2006;Rompala et al, 2013), while genetic overexpression of NR2B subunit in the forebrain of mice and rats enhanced memory functions such as object recognition memory, fear memory, fear extinction memory, hippocampus-dependent spatial memory, and prefrontal cortex-dependent spatial working memory (Cui et al, 2011;Tang et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2009). Although NMDARs, especially the NR2B-containing NMDARs are supposed to be crucially involved in the processes underlying memory formation Shimizu et al, 2000;Tang et al, 1999;Tsien et al, 1996;Zhao et al, 2005), it has also been found that excessive activation of NMDARs mediates the excitotoxicity in the pathogenesis of numerous neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%