1991
DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(91)90232-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypoglycemia in hepatocellular carcinoma: Failure of short-term growth hormone administration to reduce enhanced glucose requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ml of normal or tumor serum was passed over a Sephadex G-200 (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc., Uppsala, Sweden) column (2.2 x 70 cm, flow rate 10 ml/h) in Dulbecco's buffer, pH 7.4, containing 20 mg/ 100 ml of NaN3. Fractions 51-64, 65-71, and 72-84 corresponding to the elution ranges of the 150-and 50-kD IGFBP complexes (as determined from the radiochromatographic pattern of normal and tumor serum preequilibrated with 125I-rhIGF II and gel filtered over the same Sephadex G-200 column) and fractions eluting before (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50) and after (85-95 and 96-115) the two complexes (2 mg of HSA was added to fractions 80-115 to prevent adsorption of IGF to the tubes) were pooled, dialysed against 0.1 M NH4HCO3 in Spectrapor dialysis tubing (molecular weight cut-off, 3,500), lyophilized, and dissolved in 2 ml Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer, pH 7.4. The biological activity in each pool was determined in the presence of0.3 Ml of insulin antiserum (neutralizing capacity 0.4 mU) in the rat fat-cell assay (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ml of normal or tumor serum was passed over a Sephadex G-200 (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc., Uppsala, Sweden) column (2.2 x 70 cm, flow rate 10 ml/h) in Dulbecco's buffer, pH 7.4, containing 20 mg/ 100 ml of NaN3. Fractions 51-64, 65-71, and 72-84 corresponding to the elution ranges of the 150-and 50-kD IGFBP complexes (as determined from the radiochromatographic pattern of normal and tumor serum preequilibrated with 125I-rhIGF II and gel filtered over the same Sephadex G-200 column) and fractions eluting before (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50) and after (85-95 and 96-115) the two complexes (2 mg of HSA was added to fractions 80-115 to prevent adsorption of IGF to the tubes) were pooled, dialysed against 0.1 M NH4HCO3 in Spectrapor dialysis tubing (molecular weight cut-off, 3,500), lyophilized, and dissolved in 2 ml Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer, pH 7.4. The biological activity in each pool was determined in the presence of0.3 Ml of insulin antiserum (neutralizing capacity 0.4 mU) in the rat fat-cell assay (13).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 also allows a therapeutic consideration: it should be possible to interrupt the vicious cycle and to reduce the glucose requirement in patients with EPTH by administering GH. Although Wing et al [13] have been unable to reduce enhanced glucose requirements in hypo glycemic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma by res toring GH levels towards normal during short-term GH infusion, glucose requirements were lowered by infusing higher doses of GH which raised serum GH levels into the acromegalic range [ 13], Altogether, EPTH can be classified as a paraneoplastic syndrome. In contrast to other paraneoplastic syndromes, oversecretion of the hormonal factor, big IGF II, by the tumor is masked in EPTH (1) by a 'negative feedback' obviously suppressing the production of normal IGF II by the body, and (2) by an altered distribution of the hor mone between its specific BP complexes in serum, which essentially enhances its bioavailability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was debated for many years whether this syn drome might be caused by tumor-derived IGFs (formerly known as somatomedins or nonsuppressible insulin-like activity, NSILA) [2][3][4][5]. In some individuals, increased serum total immunoreactive IGF-II levels have been found [6][7][8], free IGF-II is reported to be elevated [6], and the IGF-ILIGF-I ratio is generally elevated [7], There are many examples, however, where total immunoreactive IGF-II is reported to be normal or low [5,[8][9][10], often despite demonstrable overexpression of IGF-II mRNA by the tumor [11][12][13].…”
Section: Oversecretion Of Igf-ii Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 99%