1943
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1943.02010150088008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypoplasia of the Mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from their occurrence in the Treacher Collins syndrome, these features may be present alone, comprising the Pierre Robin syndrome. As described by Lenstrup (1925), Ely and Farber (1930), Davis and Dunn (1933), Robin (1934) and Lapage (1937), the condition shows a remarkable tendency to spontaneous improvement; this, and the fact that the symphysis menti is nearly vertical and the angle of the mandible nearly a right angle (Walker, 1956), have diverted attention from the purely teratogenic theory of origin to that expressed by Llewellyn and Biggs (1943), viz., that the micrognathia is purely a mechanical effect produced by the pressure of the chin against the sternum in the vertex position of the foetus; these authors went even further: they claimed that the frequent complication of cleft palate may be the result of the tongue being pushed back into the mouth and preventing the fusion of the palatal processes. Mandibular Dysostosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Apart from their occurrence in the Treacher Collins syndrome, these features may be present alone, comprising the Pierre Robin syndrome. As described by Lenstrup (1925), Ely and Farber (1930), Davis and Dunn (1933), Robin (1934) and Lapage (1937), the condition shows a remarkable tendency to spontaneous improvement; this, and the fact that the symphysis menti is nearly vertical and the angle of the mandible nearly a right angle (Walker, 1956), have diverted attention from the purely teratogenic theory of origin to that expressed by Llewellyn and Biggs (1943), viz., that the micrognathia is purely a mechanical effect produced by the pressure of the chin against the sternum in the vertex position of the foetus; these authors went even further: they claimed that the frequent complication of cleft palate may be the result of the tongue being pushed back into the mouth and preventing the fusion of the palatal processes. Mandibular Dysostosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Transferred to K. L. B., on Xovember 14th of the same year, in a bad condition. The diagnosis was confirmed, a. o. with positive guinea-pig test in C. 8. F. which also contained approximately 300 Icukocytes/nini~.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Some authors claim t o have stimulated the development of the lower jaw through constant liuliing with the aid of some headgear (4) or by a special traction apparatus (5); otliers, referring to successful experiments, recommend a meclianical dcrica on the bottle that forces the infant to push its chin forward in order to suck (6). A brace behind the anguli mandibulae to lift the lower j a w forward (3, 7 , 8) has often been tried. In a few cases trac31ieotomy has even been performed (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-nasion, a point on the suture between the frontal and nasal bones. 6. S-sella turcica; the center of the sella turcica is determined by inspection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%