2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothalamic activation after stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in the cat: a Fos study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fi ndings indicate a complex relationship between nociceptive trigeminal neuronal activation and suppression of food intake at the level of the hypothalamus, consistent with clinical observations of loss of appetite in primary headaches [23]. Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in the cat has also demonstrated hypothalamic activation in the supraoptic and posterior hypothalamic nucleus, consistent with a role for hypothalamic structures in modulation of nociceptive processing [24].…”
Section: Experimental Evidence For Hypothalamic Involvement In Clustesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The fi ndings indicate a complex relationship between nociceptive trigeminal neuronal activation and suppression of food intake at the level of the hypothalamus, consistent with clinical observations of loss of appetite in primary headaches [23]. Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in the cat has also demonstrated hypothalamic activation in the supraoptic and posterior hypothalamic nucleus, consistent with a role for hypothalamic structures in modulation of nociceptive processing [24].…”
Section: Experimental Evidence For Hypothalamic Involvement In Clustesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Although animal experiments suggest the lateral hypothalamus to be involved in pain modulation (Dafny et al, 1996;Workman and Lumb, 1997), serving as a relay station for nociceptive transmission and autonomic function (Randich and Gebhart, 1992), electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus to produce analgesia has only been used in experimental animals (Lopez et al, 1991). Conversely, electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus activates the supra-optic nucleus and posterior hypothalamic area (Benjamin et al, 2004) [a monosynaptic pathway connecting the hypothalamus and trigeminal nucleus has been documented (Malick et al, 2000)]. The posterior hypothalamus is able to both decrease and enhance nociceptive responses in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Bartsch et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One plausible explanation for sensitisation in migraine would be dysfunction of known sub-cortical trigeminal modulatory nuclei, i.e., disinhibitory sensitisation rather than sensitisation due to abnormal afferent traffi c [58] . Most prominent among these inhibitory systems are projections from brainstem structures, such as the periaqueductal gray (PAG), nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and the rostroventral medulla (RVM), which have a profound antinociceptive effect on these neurons [59] , but other structures such as the hypothalamus [60] , thalamus [61] and cortical regions seem also to be involved. Recent fi ndings emphasize the role of the ventrolateral division of the PAG (vlPAG) in trigeminal nociception as stimulation of the vlPAG modulates dural nociception and receives input from trigeminovascular afferent [62][63][64] .…”
Section: Disinhibitory Sensitisation -Disordered Modulation Of Trigemmentioning
confidence: 99%