2004
DOI: 10.1145/1013560.1013565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis-based semantics of logic programs in multivalued logics

Abstract: We address the problem of defining semantics for logic programs in presence of incomplete and contradictory information coming from different sources. The information consists of facts that a central server collects and tries to combine using (a) a set of logical rules, that is, a logic program, and (b) a hypothesis representing the server's own estimates. In such a setting incomplete information from a source or contradictory information from different sources necessitate the use of manyvalued logics in which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work generalizes related work such as [2,26,31,32,36]. In [31] it has been shown that the usual semantics of logic programs can be obtained through a unique computation method, but using different uniform assumptions, i.e.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our work generalizes related work such as [2,26,31,32,36]. In [31] it has been shown that the usual semantics of logic programs can be obtained through a unique computation method, but using different uniform assumptions, i.e.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Consider the following case, adapted from [32,36]. A judge is collecting information from two sources, the public prosecutor and the counsel for the defense, in order to decide whether to charge a person named Ted, accused of murder.…”
Section: Mixing Owa and Cwamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In those works, some atoms are allowed to be interpreted according to the OWA, while others are allowed to be interpreted according to the CWA and, thus, roughly the choice of the default is restricted to the value unknown and/or false. The general case, where any assignment may be considered as the default knowledge, is approached in [22], but relying on a weak evaluation of formulas (based on the possible values of unknown atoms), and thus leads to a weaker semantics than the one presented here (that relies on classical formulas evaluation). To the best of our knowledge there is no other work addressing the general case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the idea of non-uniform assumptions, consider the following example. Examples motivating the need for combining OWA and CWA can be found in [10,22,32,33] and in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%