1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00831.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis testing with the similarity index

Abstract: Multilocus DNA fingerprinting methods have been used extensively to address genetic issues in wildlife populations. Hypotheses concerning population subdivision and differing levels of diversity can be addressed through the use of the similarity index (S), a band-sharing coefficient, and many researchers construct hypothesis tests with S based on the work of Lynch. It is shown in the present study, through mathematical analysis and through simulations, that estimates of the variance of a mean S based on Lynch'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA was extracted and PCR conducted as listed above. From these accessions, the within-accession mean genetic diversity values were also estimated from the 33 SSR markers using the similarity index (Dice 1945;Lynch 1990;Leonard et al 1999). The similarity index is defined as: S xy = 2N m /N x ?…”
Section: Subspecies Diversity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA was extracted and PCR conducted as listed above. From these accessions, the within-accession mean genetic diversity values were also estimated from the 33 SSR markers using the similarity index (Dice 1945;Lynch 1990;Leonard et al 1999). The similarity index is defined as: S xy = 2N m /N x ?…”
Section: Subspecies Diversity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N y , where N m is the number of marker bands that are shared between individuals x and y, and N x and N y are the total number of bands present in each respective individual. Standard errors of the mean similarity values were computed as per Leonard et al (1999). As the banding patterns of autopolyploid organisms with codominant markers may not express individual's genotypes (Kosman and Leonard 2005), SSR markers were scored as presence/absence binary data.…”
Section: Subspecies Diversity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, support for internal clades were determined using 1,000 bootstrap replicates and heuristic, unweighted Wagner parsimony searches with TBR branch swapping and 10 random addition sequences in each bootstrap replicate. The significance of AFLP variation within and among groups was also tested based on comparisons of similarity coefficients as described by Leonard et al (1999) and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) as described below.…”
Section: Aflp Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other genotypes were anticipated to be hybrid-or direct-descendants of these four base populations. Finally, statistical comparisons of genetic diversity within populations were based on the similarity index (S), based on unbiased estimates of the variance for S corrected for covariance [58].…”
Section: Genetic Testing Of Half-sib Hybrid Seedmentioning
confidence: 99%