2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis: Unrecognized actions of ENaC blockade in improving refractory-resistant hypertension and residual cardiovascular risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 175 ) Even in treated hypertensive patients roughly 30% suffer from left ventricular hypertrophy (29%), diastolic (21%) or systolic (6%) ventricular dysfunction, left atrial expansion (15%), and silent myocardial ischemia (6%). In 13% of this group three or more of these abnormalities occur in combination ( 176 ). Apparently, anti-hypertensive therapy does not alter all components of the underlying mechanisms of hypertension that confer CV risk independent of blood pressure ( 176 ).…”
Section: Residual Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…( 175 ) Even in treated hypertensive patients roughly 30% suffer from left ventricular hypertrophy (29%), diastolic (21%) or systolic (6%) ventricular dysfunction, left atrial expansion (15%), and silent myocardial ischemia (6%). In 13% of this group three or more of these abnormalities occur in combination ( 176 ). Apparently, anti-hypertensive therapy does not alter all components of the underlying mechanisms of hypertension that confer CV risk independent of blood pressure ( 176 ).…”
Section: Residual Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 13% of this group three or more of these abnormalities occur in combination ( 176 ). Apparently, anti-hypertensive therapy does not alter all components of the underlying mechanisms of hypertension that confer CV risk independent of blood pressure ( 176 ). Current guidelines therefore advise lifestyle changes, lipid-lowering therapy, antiplatelet therapy and fasting glucose management depending on the risk profile of the patient ( 177 ).…”
Section: Residual Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit/risk ratio for RDN in resistant hypertension may prima facie be considered analogous to the cancer example above, because of the very high cardiovascular risk of this population despite four-drug treatment [123,124]. However, up to 50% of these subjects are misdiagnosed (poor BP recording technique, white coat effect, high-salt diet, use of pressors), have a treatable secondary cause, or have not been given proven drug therapies such as spironolactone or amiloride [125,126]. Also, nonadherence to therapy must be ruled out (e.g., ambulatory BP monitoring after witnessed intake of medications).…”
Section: Ethical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 During his time at Vanderbilt, he published extensively, guiding future perspectives of salt sensitivity of blood pressure research. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Dr Elijovich was actively investigating the role of inflammation in salt-sensitive hypertension in collaboration with our team in the Division of Clinical Pharmacology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He was also participating as a mentor for the Zambia-Vanderbilt Training Partnership for HIV-Nutrition-Metabolic Research, collaborating with researchers in Zambia to understand the pathogenesis of salt-sensitive hypertension in people living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa and how immune activation and excess dietary Na + intake play a role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%