Compared with other segments of respiratory physiology, control of breathing was poorly understood at the beginning of the twentieth century. In the first half of the century, knowledge slowly accumulated, and by midcentury, a nascent field of investigation was recognizable. In the second half of the century, this field blossomed with an array of basic discoveries, so that by the end of the century, study of control of breathing emerged as a multidisciplinary research focus that held substantial promise for contribution to understanding disease.
THE TWENTIETH CENTURY OPENS WITH A THEORYAt the end of the nineteenth century, investigators knew that an increase in blood CO 2 or a decrease in O 2 provoked an increase in ventilation. Haldane's groundbreaking experiments at the turn of the century showed that small increases in inspired CO 2 concentration stimulated breathing, whereas a comparable ventilatory response to hypoxia was achieved only by a large decrease in inspired O 2 concentration (1). In 1911, Winterstein (2) (Figure 1) suggested that CO 2 stimulated breathing by acidifying extracellular fluid near the "respiratory centers," and Gesell (3) speculated that the intracellular concentration of hydrogen ion of respiratory neurons was the ultimate stimulus to breathing. Comroe (4) ( Figure 2) and others searched for chemosensory areas by injecting into the brain solutions, which increased local Pco 2 in inspiratory and expiratory centers. The results were inconsistent, however, and this approach was abandoned for 50 years.Haldane's pioneering work led to the tidy scenario that CO 2 , acting exclusively in the brain, was the dominant chemoreflex stimulus and that hypoxia stimulated breathing by acidifying the brain. This was the dominant view in the first quarter of the twentieth century, but in the 1920s, two key observations indicated that this scenario was flawed. First, arterial pH was found to increase, not decrease, during hypoxia, indicating that something other than hydrogen ion was driving the ventilatory response to hypoxia. The glimmer of an entirely new dimension in chemoreflex control of breathing appeared in 1926, when de Castro (5) presented histologic evidence of a chemoreceptive function of the carotid body (Figure 3). In the 1930s, Heymans and Heymans made their revolutionary observation that anoxemia or hypercapnia of the aortic or carotid regions stimulated breathing. Although the ideas of Haldane and Winterstein did not fade easily, Gesell (6) enthusiastically heralded the new perspective: