2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hysteresis and fiscal stimulus in a recession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, simulations based on our simulated DSGE model provide a reasonably close match to empirical approximations based on the method of Chodorow-Reich (2019), especially over the first three years of the program period, the period before the Australian economy suffered another cyclical downturn related to the end of the mining boom. Model simulations reinforce the fact that output and employment multipliers related to public infrastructure spending can be relatively large, and also crowd-in private sector investment, making them a useful complement to transfer-like stimulus measures that tend to increase private consumption, but crowd-out private investment (see Watson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, simulations based on our simulated DSGE model provide a reasonably close match to empirical approximations based on the method of Chodorow-Reich (2019), especially over the first three years of the program period, the period before the Australian economy suffered another cyclical downturn related to the end of the mining boom. Model simulations reinforce the fact that output and employment multipliers related to public infrastructure spending can be relatively large, and also crowd-in private sector investment, making them a useful complement to transfer-like stimulus measures that tend to increase private consumption, but crowd-out private investment (see Watson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…From a policy perspective, the model implies that it would be optimal to combine public investment stimulus with transfers, or transfer-like measures along the lines of the JobKeeper Payment which have a more beneficial impact on private sector consumption in the short-run. The case for combining public sector investment with transfer programs in stimulus is strengthened in the open economy context, where transfer-like programs are more detrimental to international competitiveness over the medium to long-run (see Tervala and Watson, 2022). output multipliers.…”
Section: Calibration and Bayesian Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to Lucas (2003), who argued that the welfare costs of business cycles are negligible without hysteresis, Tervala demonstrated that the welfare costs of recessions are significant when hysteresis is considered. Tervala and Watson (2022) analyzed the output and welfare multipliers of fiscal stimulus during a recession. Transfer payments, public consumption, and investment all have high output and welfare multipliers due to their positive effects on total factor productivity (TFP) in a recessionary environment.…”
Section: The Ongoing Neoclassical Debate Regarding Hysteresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address output dynamics arising from stochastic shocks on both the demand and supply sides, we adopt Monetarist and Keynesian approaches. Furthermore, in response to economic slowdowns stemming from technological delays in adapting to changing consumer preferences, fiscal authorities can leverage a range of policy instruments (Galí, 2020;Resosudarmo et al, 2021;Tervala & Watson, 2022). For example, they may provide technological support and investment incentives for companies to engage in research and development (R&D).…”
Section: Beyond the Model: Relaxing Assumptions And Embracing Fiscal ...mentioning
confidence: 99%