Hysteresis and labour market institutions. Evidence from the UK and the Netherlands

Abstract

This paper uses data for the UK and the Netherlands (1983q4-2011q4) to test if hysteresis occurs in these economies, and through what mechanisms. The novelty of the paper resides in the use of a VAR-IRF that encompasses previous hysteresis studies, using long-term unemployment, productivity, capital stock and real long-term interest rates, and in the use of specific Labour Market Institutions shocks, such as benefits, taxation or unions' power. This allows us to disentangle what specific demand and supply-variables affect unemployment in the long-run, i.e. the NAIRU. Our findings suggest that there is hysteresis in both countries, and that it happens through several channels. Further, we find that the influence of Labour Market Institutions on unemployment depend on their impact on the real wages-productivity gap. These results have implications for structural and macroeconomic policies that we also discuss. Finally, we investigate the impact of different supply and demand-shock on long-term unemployment and discuss the relevant policy implications.Keywords Hysteresis · NAIRU · Labour Market Institutions · Impulse response analysisWe would like to thank the referee and the editor for their comments and useful suggestions. We are also grateful to

Revisiting the hysteresis hypothesis: an ARIMAX approach

“…Finally, it is possible to examine hysteresis effects using VAR models, as in the recent paper by Rodriguez-Gil (2017), and cross-country panel regressions, as in Baccaro and Rei (2007), Klär (2011), andStockhammer et al (2014). These papers control for labour market institutions including employment protection, social security levels, union density, and so on, and find an important independent role of capital accumulation and real interest rates in driving medium run unemployment rates.…”

Long-term health conditions and UK labour market outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Such support would have been of benefit to many people even prior to the pandemic [6-11], but their need is even more pressing now. Disruption in labour market outcomes due to a shock can persist for many years [70][71][72], creating an ongoing need for support.…”

Danimarka ve İsveç İçin İşsizlik Histerisi Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi

“…The study of Blanchard and Summers (1986) is at the forefront of the empirical studies on unemployment hysteresis. Apart from this study, other examined empirical studies are as follows: Brunello (1990), Neudorfer et al (1990), Jaeger and Parkinson (1994), Røed (1996), Song and Wu (1997), Arestis and Mariscal (1999), Papell et al (2000), León-Ledesma (2002), Camarero and Tamarit (2004), Camarero et al (2006), Gustavsson and Österholm (2006), Camarero et al (2008), Gomes and Da Silva (2008), Lee and Chang (2008), Lee et al (2009), Lee (2010), Chang (2011), Ayala et al (2012), Cevik and Dibooglu (2013), Lee et al (2013), Bakas and Papapetrou (2014), Cheng et al (2014), Furuoka (2014), Tiwari (2014), Jiang and Chang (2016), Akdoğan (2017), Güriş et al (2017), Meng et al (2017), Bahmani-Oskooee et al (2018), Rodriguez-Gil (2018), Yaya et al (2019), Khraief et al (2020), Omay et al (2020), Yilanci et al (2020), Omay et al (2021), Bostancı and Koç (2022), Caporale et al (2022),…”