1994
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450720404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hysteresis effects in countercurrent gas‐liquid flow limitations in a vertical tube

Abstract: New experiments on air‐water countercurrent flow limitations in a vertical pipe are presented. The experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of test procedure on the occurrence of the two countercurrent flow limitations; namely the onset of flooding and complete carry‐up limits. The results revealed the existence of significant hysteresis effects at both limits particularly for high liquid feed rate. For low liquid feed rate, hysteresis effects were only observed at the complete carry‐up limit. So… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, this coalescence process leads to the blocking of certain channels for the gas phase and therefore makes it difficult to transfer back to nonflooded operation when the gas flow rates are decreased. The dependency of the hysteresis on the liquid flow rate is in good qualitative agreement with the observations of previous investigations on single tubes. , On the other hand, previous work with tube bundles did not show any hysteresis, which might be due to the lower liquid flow rates applied in the experiments, thicker walls allowing better liquid drainage at the outlet, and differences in the outlet section itself.
12 Flooding and deflooding behavior based on pressure drop changes (closed symbols for increasing and open symbols for decreasing gas flow): ▪/□ u Ls = 0.65 cm/s, ·/○ u Ls = 4.75 cm/s; 25 cpsi, ⌀ = 43 mm, decane/air.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Apparently, this coalescence process leads to the blocking of certain channels for the gas phase and therefore makes it difficult to transfer back to nonflooded operation when the gas flow rates are decreased. The dependency of the hysteresis on the liquid flow rate is in good qualitative agreement with the observations of previous investigations on single tubes. , On the other hand, previous work with tube bundles did not show any hysteresis, which might be due to the lower liquid flow rates applied in the experiments, thicker walls allowing better liquid drainage at the outlet, and differences in the outlet section itself.
12 Flooding and deflooding behavior based on pressure drop changes (closed symbols for increasing and open symbols for decreasing gas flow): ▪/□ u Ls = 0.65 cm/s, ·/○ u Ls = 4.75 cm/s; 25 cpsi, ⌀ = 43 mm, decane/air.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, this method only suits for transparent towers. In addition, the delay in reaction and the hysteresis effect , may make it unsuitable in practice. Flooding can also be identified by noticing the increase in liquid holdup using γ ‐scan and X‐ray scan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%