“…However, previous studies have not defined the specific wind attack angle increments, and different scholars have adopted nonidentical values. As shown in Table 1, different wind attack angle increments, such as 2° (Fleming and Popplewell, 2010; Li et al, 2016), 5° (Cai et al, 2015; Chabart and Lilien, 1998; Gjelstrup et al, 2012; Keutgen and Lilien, 2000; Liu et al, 2013; Lou et al, 2014; Yan et al, 2013, 2014), 10° (Chadha and Jaster, 1975; Demartino, 2014; Ma et al, 2017), and 20° (Nigol and Buchan, 1981), have been adopted in existing research while performing wind tunnel tests for the aerodynamic coefficients of iced cable structures. Therefore, selecting appropriate wind attack angle increments that can ensure the accuracy of the test data, shorten the period of experiment, and reduce the expense of the experiment is a problem that should be addressed immediately.…”