2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2017.2771372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hysteresis Suppressing of Modulated Magnetoresistive Sensors Using Bidirection Pulse Magnetization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth pointing out that hysteresis was still inevitable in the sensor, as shown in Figure 5, which is similar to previous papers [15,18]. In order to restrain the influence of this hysteresis for the application of sensing elements, on the one hand, researchers have taken many measures (e.g., optimizing the annealing process, biasing the sensor with permanent magnetic materials, or inducing perpendicular anisotropy in the free layer by reducing the thickness of the free layer [24,25]) to reduce the hysteresis, and on the other hand, we can also magnetize the sensor to the saturation state to ensure working at the same branch [26]. In this way, the hysteresis errors of the device without and with the double-gap MFC were 5.1% and 5.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth pointing out that hysteresis was still inevitable in the sensor, as shown in Figure 5, which is similar to previous papers [15,18]. In order to restrain the influence of this hysteresis for the application of sensing elements, on the one hand, researchers have taken many measures (e.g., optimizing the annealing process, biasing the sensor with permanent magnetic materials, or inducing perpendicular anisotropy in the free layer by reducing the thickness of the free layer [24,25]) to reduce the hysteresis, and on the other hand, we can also magnetize the sensor to the saturation state to ensure working at the same branch [26]. In this way, the hysteresis errors of the device without and with the double-gap MFC were 5.1% and 5.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%