2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6ef9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hα Distances to the Leading Arm of the Magellanic Stream

Abstract: The Leading Arm (LA) is a tidal feature that is in front of the Magellanic Clouds (MCs) on their orbit through the Galaxy’s halo. Many physical properties of the LA, such as its mass and size, are poorly constrained because it has few distance measurements. While Hα measurements have been used to estimate the distances to halo clouds, many studies have been unsuccessful in detecting Hα from the LA. In this study, we explore a group of H i clouds which lie 75°–90° from the MCs. Through ultraviolet and 21 cm rad… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If in the strong cooling regime, which seems applicable, the present-day Leading Arm is likely a series of clumps in the long cooling tail behind the progenitor cloud. This is consistent with observations, which find a clear distance variation along the Leading Arm (Venzmer et al 2012;For et al 2016;Antwi-Danso et al 2020). The clumpy, fragmented nature of the Leading Arm, rather than a coherent tail, could be due to cut-offs in observational sensitivity, i.e.…”
Section: The Leading Arm: Analytic Estimatessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…If in the strong cooling regime, which seems applicable, the present-day Leading Arm is likely a series of clumps in the long cooling tail behind the progenitor cloud. This is consistent with observations, which find a clear distance variation along the Leading Arm (Venzmer et al 2012;For et al 2016;Antwi-Danso et al 2020). The clumpy, fragmented nature of the Leading Arm, rather than a coherent tail, could be due to cut-offs in observational sensitivity, i.e.…”
Section: The Leading Arm: Analytic Estimatessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, there is no evidence for photoionized Si IV and C IV in the Leading Arm, because its Si IV and C IV components tend to be broader and therefore collisionally ionized. The different ionization mechanism for the high ions can be understood in terms of the LA's proximity to the MW (d LA ≈20 kpc; McClure-Griffiths et al 2008;Antwi-Danso et al 2020), which causes it to interact with a much denser external medium than the Stream does (d MS ≈75-150 kpc according to models; Besla et al 2007;Pardy et al 2018;Lucchini et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proximity leads to an interaction with a much denser external medium than the Stream encounters. Both observations (McClure-Griffiths et al 2008;Antwi-Danso et al 2020) and models (Besla et al 2007;Pardy et al 2018) indicate that the Leading Arm (d LA ≈20 kpc) is much closer to the MW than the Stream is (d MS > 55 kpc, and possibly d MS ≈ 75 − 150 kpc). We suggest that distance (and therefore density of the external medium) is the primary reason why the high-ions appear to be collisionally ionized in the LA but not in the Stream.…”
Section: The Kinematics and Ionization Of The Leading Armmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, we were unable to use either of these lines to calibrate our velocities using the method described in Hausen et al (2002) and . Instead, we used the velocity calibration technique that is described by Barger et al (2017) and Antwi-Danso et al (2020) for WHAM observations that do not overlap with bright atmospheric lines at well established transitions. Using this technique, we calibrated our velocity by monitoring the pressure of the SF 6 gas in the WHAM Fabry-Pérot etalons and by further refining the calibration by comparing our observations with an atmospheric template.…”
Section: Velocity Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we modeled the H i emission the LMC and its surroundings to convert our Hα observations into a LMCSR velocity reference frame. This is especially beneficial because the gaseous H i emission extends much further than the stellar disk and because Hα emission tends to kinematically follow the H i emission in HVCs (e.g., Haffner et al 2001;Putman et al 2003;Hill et al 2009;Barger et al 2012Barger et al , 2017Antwi-Danso et al 2020).…”
Section: Lmcsr Velocity Framementioning
confidence: 99%