2005
DOI: 10.1080/1360311042000320464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Disability Rights in Education Modelfor evaluating inclusive education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The small group of Xhosa-speaking children, the children with disabilities as well as those from poverty-stricken households are viewed by both teachers and learners as "different". They are bullied and teachers, despite the fact that they experienced discrimination themselves during the Apartheid era, seem unable to grasp the fact that their own attitudes towards diversity contradict basic human rights and equitable access to education (Peters, Johnstone, & Ferguson, 2005). This is in accordance with the view of Young (1990) that notions of distributive justice have limited value in education; since rights are relationships not things and educational inequalities go beyond issues of access.…”
Section: Data Integration and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The small group of Xhosa-speaking children, the children with disabilities as well as those from poverty-stricken households are viewed by both teachers and learners as "different". They are bullied and teachers, despite the fact that they experienced discrimination themselves during the Apartheid era, seem unable to grasp the fact that their own attitudes towards diversity contradict basic human rights and equitable access to education (Peters, Johnstone, & Ferguson, 2005). This is in accordance with the view of Young (1990) that notions of distributive justice have limited value in education; since rights are relationships not things and educational inequalities go beyond issues of access.…”
Section: Data Integration and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As inclusive curricula aim to be responsive to learners' needs, assessment should be performed and measured using these same inclusive principles. This means, amongst other things, avoiding the temptation to over-emphasize standardized outcomes in relation to pre-established targets of content knowledge, as this kind of information does not necessarily correlate with adult success in social, vocational, or other indicators of quality of life (Peters et al 2005). In contrast, formative assessment (assessment for learning instead of assessment of learning) has been shown to be an important tool that teachers can use to give feedback on the learners' participation and achievement, to identify areas for development, to motivate and engage learners, and to develop their reflection skills (Watkins 2007).…”
Section: Teachers As Competent Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Increasingly, systems are being forced to use standards-based curricula and tests with their performance goals being measured against expected outcomes. Schools that find difficulty in maintaining these standards are progressively more reluctant to include students with disabilities who may affect their scores (Peters, Johnstone, & Ferguson, 2005). This is certainly likely to be an issue in Hong Kong where the schooling system is seen as "rigid, highly competitive and strongly weighted towards academic subjects" (Pearson, Lo, Chui & Wong, 2003, p. 490).…”
Section: Education Reform For Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 97%