2004
DOI: 10.1002/num.20050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori error estimates for the mixed finite element method with Lagrange multipliers

Abstract: We consider the mixed finite element method with Lagrange multipliers as applied to second-order elliptic equations in divergence form with mixed boundary conditions. The corresponding Galerkin scheme is defined by using Raviart-Thomas spaces. We develop a posteriori error analyses yielding a reliable and efficient estimate based on residuals, and a reliable and quasi-efficient estimate based on local problems, respectively. Several numerical results illustrate the suitability of these a posteriori estimates f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the estimator M ⊕ can be easily evaluated using the lower bound (16). Namely, for the effectivity index of M ⊕ we have:…”
Section: Estimate In the Full Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The efficiency of the estimator M ⊕ can be easily evaluated using the lower bound (16). Namely, for the effectivity index of M ⊕ we have:…”
Section: Estimate In the Full Normmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual-based estimates were developed in [2], [6], [12], [1], [16] for the diffusion-type equation and extended in [14] and [20] to the equations of linear elasticity. The superconvergence-based (averaging-type) error estimators were proposed in [7] and [13] to control the L 2 -error of the flux variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is a generic expression denoting one or several terms of higher order. While the list of references on a-posteriori error analysis for mixed formulations of linear and nonlinear problems is nowadays quite extensive, which includes several important contributions in recent years, most of the main ideas and associated techniques employed can be found in [3], [4], [14], [17], [30], [52], [54], and the references therein. In particular, the first corresponding results for elliptic partial differential equations of second order, which consider a-posteriori error estimators of explicit residual type, the solution of local problems, and the eventual derivation of reliability and efficiency properties, among other issues, go back to [52], [4], [14] and [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superconvergence-based (averaging-type) error estimators are proposed in [5,8] to control the L 2 -error of the flux variable. Further, the estimators based on the solution of local problems are given in [2,11,14] and a hierarchical estimator can be found in [22]. Finally, a comparison of these four types of error estimators for mixed finite element discretizations by Raviart-Thomas elements is presented in [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%