2023
DOI: 10.1515/jnma-2022-0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori error estimates for hierarchical mixed-dimensional elliptic equations

Abstract: Mixed-dimensional elliptic equations exhibiting a hierarchical structure are commonly used to model problems with high aspect ratio inclusions, such as flow in fractured porous media. We derive general abstract estimates based on the theory of functional a posteriori error estimates, for which guaranteed upper bounds for the primal and dual variables and two-sided bounds for the primal-dual pair are obtained. We improve on the abstract results obtained with the functional approach by proposing four different w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extend the model of a single fracture to a more general setting, we first need to introduce the mixed-dimensional geometric decomposition of the domain. The formulation follows the one originally proposed by Boon et al (2018) and more closely follows the one recently employed by Varela et al (2023). First, consider a domain 𝑌 ⊂ ℝ 2 , decomposed into 𝑚 subdomains Ω 𝑖 of dimension 𝑑 𝑖 = 𝑑(𝑖) so that 𝑌 = âˆȘ đ‘–âˆˆđŒ Ω 𝑖 , with đŒ = {1, 
 , 𝑚}.…”
Section: Mixed-dimensional Geometric Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To extend the model of a single fracture to a more general setting, we first need to introduce the mixed-dimensional geometric decomposition of the domain. The formulation follows the one originally proposed by Boon et al (2018) and more closely follows the one recently employed by Varela et al (2023). First, consider a domain 𝑌 ⊂ ℝ 2 , decomposed into 𝑚 subdomains Ω 𝑖 of dimension 𝑑 𝑖 = 𝑑(𝑖) so that 𝑌 = âˆȘ đ‘–âˆˆđŒ Ω 𝑖 , with đŒ = {1, 
 , 𝑚}.…”
Section: Mixed-dimensional Geometric Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our first numerical example, we perform a convergence analysis for the case of a single vertical line Ω 1 fully embedded in a unit square Ω 2 , coupled via the interfaces Γ 1 and Γ 2 to the left and right of the fracture, respectively. Following closely Varela et al (2023), we assume the existence of a piecewise hydraulic head distribution in the bulk ℎ 2 (we refer to Appendix C for the derivation of all relevant quantities for this analysis), from where all other variables of interest can be derived. In the left panel of Figure 5, we show the geometric setup and the exact hydraulic head distribution in the matrix for the final simulation time.…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the model of a single fracture to a more general setting, we first need to introduce the mixed-dimensional geometric decomposition of the domain. The formulation follows the one originally proposed by Boon et al (2018) and more closely the one recently employed by Varela et al (2022). First, consider a domain 𝑌 ⊂ ℝ !…”
Section: Mixed-dimensional Geometric Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following closely Varela et al (2022), we assume the existence of a piecewise hydraulic quantities for this analysis), from where all other variables of interest can be derived. In the left panel of Figure 4, we show the geometric setup and the exact solution hydraulic head distribution in the matrix for the final simulation time.…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation