1976
DOI: 10.1063/1.3024662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Short Course in Cloud Physics and Clouds, Rain, and Rainmaking, 2nd Edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific latent heat is defined by Eq. (7) that was calculated by cubic fit to the data of Rogers et al (11) . When the water flux flows from the surface to the air, Q latent is negative and represents the latent heat of evaporation, which draws heat from the mucus membrane surface.…”
Section: Nasal Cavity Wall Model For Heat Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific latent heat is defined by Eq. (7) that was calculated by cubic fit to the data of Rogers et al (11) . When the water flux flows from the surface to the air, Q latent is negative and represents the latent heat of evaporation, which draws heat from the mucus membrane surface.…”
Section: Nasal Cavity Wall Model For Heat Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8). The mass accommodation coefficient was set to 0.3 based on literature data in Rogers and Yau (1989) (0.2 for small ice at T > 263 K) and Skrotzki et al (2013) (0.2-1 for T = 190-235 K). The initial starting particle diameter was set to 500 nm, the same diameter as used for kaolinite experiments.…”
Section: Comparison Between Spin and Pincmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular at low T , at which the growth rates are lower, this could explain a higher AF measured with SPIN compared to PINC. Following Rogers and Yau (1989), the crystal growth by diffusion for spherical ice crystals as a function of temperature was calculated for the typical residence times in PINC and SPIN (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Comparison Between Spin and Pincmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mistake possibly originated in a WMO training manual (Retallack, 1973) and continues to propagate (Gill, 1982; Rogers and Yau, 1989; Pruppacher and Klett, 1997; Katsaros, 2001; Jacobson, 2005; Dai, 2006; Pierrehumbert, 2010), including in some background articles of TEOS-10 (Feistel et al, 2010a, 2010b) and online 11 . On the other hand, ASHRAE (1994) and BS 1339-1 (2002) identify the ratio of mixing ratios, r / r sat , as the “degree of saturation” and “percentage saturation”, respectively, thus clearly distinguishing it from the standard definition.…”
Section: Current Definition and Measurement Practicementioning
confidence: 99%